Dusty Chalk

:drool: ...but needs moar bonus tracks -- Touch Dance in its entirety, in particular, would have been nice. I need to get needledroppin'.

DSD, huh? I have to do that just so that I have some DSD files to play with.

I can't listen to Beethoven's Fifth, without thinking of this oldie but goody:

Yay for butt-comfies!

Yeah, the 3G was supposed to be flush.

Happy Birthday, hummingbird. Thanks for head-case!

I believe I bought one or two of these: Amazon.com: Headphone Adapter for Apple iPhone Recessed Jack, 3.5mm Male Female Extension Plug - Black: Electronics

I haven't received mine yet.

Yeah, but the SwissGear ones are really nice. Admittedly, I'm probably falling for the name, but still...guaranteed quality.

"Less good", I prefer to say, since I still enjoy it. The Brazilian, Tonight Tonight Tonight, Domino (pts. 1 & 2) are all great songs, and I even enjoy Land of Confusion. Me: Beethoven 7, Fischer, SACD

The only reason I thought that was because of the pic. (points in lower right corner):

Dusty translate: WANT NAO. Needz moar blak, tho. Those two silver slivers will catch the eye of "the man", if you know what I mean.

Which set? I see that Kondrashin has several, one of which appears to be DSD mastered? Or are they actual SACD's? Never mind, will go look it up. I need more Shostakovich.

Too bad he replaced those woofers with orange juicers. I wonder what that sounds like.

Wispelwey/Lazic, Brahms sonatas for piano and cello, on Channel Classics SACD, to be followed by: Wispelwey, Dvorak concerto for cello and orchestra, on Channel Classics SACD

Or perhaps patience.

These two statements seem mutually contradictory. If you're going to keep the iTouch for all the data services and apps, I'm thinking you need a dumb phone. Maybe a camera. The point being, most smart phones will require a data plan. Unless what that means to you is, "so the question becomes, what smart phone has the cheapest data plan"?

I really can't.

What a waste of meatloaf.

Dude, hardly anyone does DSD, that's a niche market, and hardly a good representation of the industry. And if you think my statement was an over-reaction, then it's because I made the same mistake you did -- I insufficiently qualified my statement. The way I read it, it sounded like you were saying ProTools was exclusively PC, which it isn't. So I stand by, "incorrect". What annoys me is not the anti-Mac reaction, but the fact that you feel that stating something more loudly makes you moar right -- it doesn't, it just makes you sound moar wrong. I'm sure if my opinion of you went down a notch, others' did, too.

I don't have a Mac. Ha-ha.

Uh, so let me get this straight -- you thought the day would come where you wouldn't be able to listen to them any more, so you pre-empted that day by making it show up earlier?

I'm sure you could get someone to build you one -- the schematics are out there.

You know they'd prefer cash.

That's probably because the guys who use Macs are actually working rather than wasting time posting. And I'm sure by "alternative", Hopstretch meant BeOS.