Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Post #701=79

 

Why not 68? 

I understand why it *could* be 79 (7 in "ten's", 7+1+1=9 in "ones"), but I think it could also be 68 - each number on the left goes up by 1 where each number on the right goes up by 11. 

 

I wonder if this puzzle was designed to cause conflict by having 2 equally valid answers and making/letting the subject think there is only one. 2 subjects get different answers and duke it out...

 

It is also possible that only 20% of the people doing the puzzle will give BOTH answers.

 

Is there a reason it is not 68 for the reason I gave? 

Posted (edited)

No, the '=' is more of a relationship like an analogy in this sense. You could read it as "115 is to 57 as 117 is to what?"

 

Edit: Mathematics is so great that I might be speaking entirely out of my ass at this point. Fallacy rules.

Edited by Emooze
Posted

Actually, was directed to nikongod. But yes, there is also the increase by 11 pattern though I was thinking along the lines of the 7 and 7+1+1 (79) = 117.

Posted

It's a trick question.  It establishes a linear pattern early, then skips a step at the last.  The stupid thing is, it tells you it's going to do that.  It's telling you, whatever your first inclination is, it's probably wrong.  Double-think your answers (which most of us are taught not to do).

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.