Jump to content

Group Build: Dynafet


luvdunhill

Recommended Posts

Hm, I hate to offer this suggestion at this point, as it's not really a layout issue, but there may be benefit from splitting up the CCSes for the diamond buffers from one per rail on the original schematic, to two per rail, each one being dedicated for leg of the two diamond buffers. The slight improvement would be the fact that you don't have to worry about matching transistors, or noise from mismatched transistors. The only addition would be two more LEDs and an extra 30K resistor to the schematic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think 512-MC78L15ACP and 512-MC79L15ACP are the best regulator choices. The 512-KA7915ATU and 512-KA7815AETU might be a second choice. They are TO-220 and handle more current, but they have 35V maximum input, where the above TO-92 parts have a maximum input of 40V. I actually couldn't find any fixed, TO-220 regulators with anything more than 35V max input, and the TO-92 regulators seemed to only go up to 40V. Anyways, I still recommend using the bigger opamp, but I suppose I can test these with a OPA134 just for the sake of testing.

We also need to add a PDIP-8 socket to the BOM.

Edited by luvdunhill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looked to me that the output resistor pads(R39 - R46) had two sets of holes, making it possible to stagger two resistors using 14mm lead spacing, one on top of the pcb using the first and third holes and one on the bottom using the second and fourth.

yes, or to piggy back the resistors on top of each other on top of the board. Now that I think about it, perhaps this is fine, but I think they could be moved slightly apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll see if I can find someone else to help.

Unless someone is shipping you something else, i had a one or two things i wanted to order i think,

i'm in Germany for atleast1-2 more weeks so if you want just contact me =)

They dont seem to have any free shipping actions running at the moment but theres still a small chance to hit their "every 85th order is free" thing :P

EDIT: just looked and in fact they dont ship to the US and Canada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering if Pars or Jacob or perhaps someone else with Dynahi boards could answer something for me. What is the maximum width of a thermal pad that could be used and there not be any overlap between the pads? Not that this is bad, but looks kinda funny and is wasteful.

I'm talking with a company that makes isolation pads that perform orders of magnitude better than the products available at Mouser / Digikey. To give you an idea, thermal conductivity of 8.0 W/mK and thermal resistance of 0.07 K/W. This is around 8 times better than for example Thermalsil III... and so far I'm seeing around a 8 degree temperature drop which is consistent with this. This is rather amazing result, IMHO (think about how much larger heat sink you would have to use to get this sort of drop!)... Since we're going to have to order pads anyways for the part kits, I was considering using these ... I'd have to get them custom cut, and there is a lead time, but I think it would be worth it for those interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering if Pars or Jacob or perhaps someone else with Dynahi boards could answer something for me. What is the maximum width of a thermal pad that could be used and there not be any overlap between the pads? Not that this is bad, but looks kinda funny and is wasteful.

FET pcb image on bottom, DHi pcb on top, Renesas 78/215's.

Dynahipcb001-1.jpg?t=1240605054

Lemme know if someone decides to back out on the inputs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad. Yea .026 between the metal tabs, about .068 between the bodies. The body itself is .3995 wide and the tabs are .4130.

yeah, the datasheet says up to 11.5mm max tab diameter, see how they jut out a bit further in? The pad widths are available in 1mm increments, so 12mm, 13mm, or 14mm would be the reasonable choices. Better than hand trimming the pads, right?! :)

I'm betting they are simply non-RoHS devices. The ones I have were dropped shipped from Renesas and have different case markings. I'll post a pic sometime soon.

Edited by luvdunhill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I measured and compared to the datasheet you linked to and everything is within specs. The measurements without a tolerance are all exactly spot on.

12mm looks too wide to prevent overlapping but will fit. 11mm would fit better given the current spacing. My dynahi pcb lays exactly on top of the printout I have and is exactly the same width with .3" more depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.