Dreadhead Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Methinks I will be getting one of these bad boys for my office setup Pico DAC -> AE2 hell yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric5676 Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 Methinks I will be getting one of these bad boys for my office setup Pico DAC -> AE2 hell yeah. There's a Pico Dac and a Pico Amp as companion pieces for one another, yes? What are the differences between the AE2 unit vs. the Pico Amp? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrecked_porsche Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 There's a Pico Dac and a Pico Amp as companion pieces for one another, yes? There is: Pico DACPico AMPPico AMP/DAC combo. I think they talked about the AE2 vs Pico amp about 10 posts back in this thread IIANM. Refer to ASR's post and also Justin said this a few posts further back: Pico is equal or slightly better than AE-2 except in battery life and RCA connectors So, there you have it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric5676 Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 There is: Pico DACPico AMPPico AMP/DAC combo. I think they talked about the AE2 vs Pico amp about 10 posts back in this thread IIANM. Refer to ASR's post and also Justin said this a few posts further back: So, there you have it. Found 'em, thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayoibushi Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Aside from the RCA's is the Pico Dac only exactly the same components as the Dac/Amp? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fungi Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 The Pico DAC has no amp circuitry; the Pico has mandatory amp circuitry. But the DAC itself is the same yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Sneis Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 The AE-2 as an amp is better than pico imo although I can't really explain why Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blessingx Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 The Pico DAC has no amp circuitry; the Pico has mandatory amp circuitry. But the DAC itself is the same yes.I thought the DAC only was upsampling beyond the DAC+amp. So at least the programming would be different, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atothex Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 I thought the DAC only was upsampling beyond the DAC+amp. So at least the programming would be different, no? I'm not quite sure I understand your question, but the DAC/amp upsamples. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blessingx Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 Yeah, sorry, it's my bad. I knew the Pico DAC+amp maxed out at 16/48 input and thought the Pico DAC only was being programmed to accept 24/96, but that's hardware upsampled (and maybe the DAC+amp was also), as you said. Sorry for the confusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 Pico DAC is exactly the same as the dac portion of the pico amp/dac. Same upsampling, same usb input restrictions, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uberburger101 Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 Then why do some people claim they sound different? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padam Posted June 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 Even they admit the difference is very little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 Different analog output stages? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beefy Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 Then why do some people claim they sound different? With the Pico DAC + Amp, everything goes through the amp stage. With the Pico DAC, it does not. That is probably enough to generate subtle differences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uberburger101 Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 Thanks for clarifying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 The reason is, as stated, the analog stage. This is true of every dac. The chip is perhaps the least significant difference between various sources. The analog stage is everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padam Posted July 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2009 I don't know much about CD players, but I compared it to a Sony 555 SACD player today. (using the input selector on the SRM-T1S with SR-007 MK1 and the same ICs) The Pico DAC held on really well while costing a fraction of the price and being much easier to use. The sound stage was a bit bigger and the sound was a bit smoother on the SACD player overall but the difference was quite small, both sounded very good. Pico will definitely stay for a while I guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knuckledragger Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 So in front of me I have a Pico DAC, GLite (v1) and DPS. I also have two of the male-male RCA adapters that came with the Pico DAC. Unfortunately, the Pico DAC will not clear the DPS -> GLite power umbilical unless I attach the PDAC upside down (and therefore reverse the R/L connectors.) This isn't a huge deal, but I was looking forward to trying out this particular Stupid Pico Trick. What would happen if I connected the PDAC to the loop out jacks on the GLite? Would I get sound, get nothing, or maybe blow something up? Do they make 90 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asr Posted March 22, 2010 Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 The loop output can also be used as an input (in which case the Input jacks act as loop out instead). http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6090529-post437.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knuckledragger Posted October 31, 2012 Report Share Posted October 31, 2012 Necroing this thread to say, dayum does this little DAC deliver. I've been listening to some ambient albums I've not heard since the 1990s and I'm amazed how much more I'm getting out of them. I'm using a decidedly consumer grade receiver driving a pair of NS1000s that are not placed in the room particularly well. In spite of that, the sound is fantastic. Either that I have tin ears. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadphoneAddict Posted October 31, 2012 Report Share Posted October 31, 2012 Necroing this thread to say, dayum does this little DAC deliver. I've been listening to some ambient albums I've not heard since the 1990s and I'm amazed how much more I'm getting out of them. I'm using a decidedly consumer grade receiver driving a pair of NS1000s that are not placed in the room particularly well. In spite of that, the sound is fantastic. Either that I have tin ears. I think I'm pushing 3 years on my Pico DAC, and still prefer it with my iPad to all the other USB DACs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.