Dusty Chalk

He's probably distracted by her shirts riding on her...uh...bits.

It's a nautilus-style transmission line. Boom-shaka-laka-laka boom-shaka-laka-laka boom-shaka-laka-laka boom!

Yeah, saw that, want, not getting. Thanks for thinking of me, though! I approve.

...and a duck pin set.

Or maybe it's just overhyped, and he really means that they're just 'good'. Don't cave in to the pressure from the queen, Monkey-man, speak the truth.

And grawk might like this one -- another polar bear/penguin tee:

It's a tactile bass transducer attached to a silicon sleeve. And it's real. I just need to see if it comes in green.

And Al's looking at her...

Yeah, we were going to wait until it stopped snowing before we started shoveling (a lesson we learned a couple years ago, or last year, I think -- walking all over the snow while it's still falling just packs it down, making it harder to shovel -- easier to do it just once), but I think around 3 I'm going to do a stint, just to lower the amount of work I do tomorrow.

That's what she said.

He really downplays how much he knows, but then he did that Flash Gordon visual reference, and you "get it" -- he's entirely serious. Well, hopefully not entirely.

I had to ask.

Favorite quote (so far): "...so if you find yourself asking questions like, 'huh?' or 'what?'..."

Awesome.

And if it's underpowered, it's going to show a different frequency response -- extreme example would be the RSA Raptor trying to drive a low impedance headphone vs. a high impedance headphone -- it's not just the amplitude that falters, the whole frequency response goes down the crapper, no matter how much you turn it up. That's not just distortion. That's impedance mismatch between amp and headphones. If they're acting like resistors, then they're going to increase the effective impedance. LRC circuit theory sez that that will change the frequency response based on the amp. Do you remember what amp you did this comparison on? Was it the MicroZOTL?

Wouldn't that depend on the amp?

That sounds more likely than the Phil Joel song (formerly Newsboys, seriously Christian lyrics -- NTTAWT, but that just ain't me). EDIT: Thank you! Yes, that was it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfxcq77FkdE

I've got something stuck in my head, and I don't know what it is. It's not George Clinton, "Atomic Dog" ("Bow-wow-wow yippee-yo yippee-yay...") and it's not Hooked on a Feeling ("Ooga chaka..."), but it's got a similarly catchy nonsense phrase -- "Boom-chaka-laka-laka boom-chaka-laka-laka boom-chaka-laka-laka boom" -- anyone have any idea what it is? I'm thinking Parliament/Funkadelic, or something like that, but I could be somewhere else entirely.

You should have a doctor look at that cough. Oh, wait...

The opening foray (Jaws) is still the best.

It brings the impedance up, I believe is the intention. (I.E. OTL amps typically need higher impedance loads, this gives it to them, but then you can plug a lower impedance headphone like a Grado or an AT into it.)

I thought it was established that the secret ingredient was kitty litter? Or am I thinking of something else?

Justified my existence. Whee!

I think the difference is largely psychological -- you know there's those switches in the signal path on the ones that aren't on the twos, so you want to hear a difference, but I don't know if it's actually there.

It certainly can be done, though historically it just plain hasn't.