Dusty Chalk

I'm going to have nightmares about that.

As Monsieur de la sammich says, that is how we roll here. When you're doing something like this ("being helpful"), don't worry too much about multiple posts. But in general, if you're going to make a long extended post, it's best to do it in a different application (e.g. notepad, vi, whatever), then copy & paste.

Yeah, I think I'll wait -- thanks for reinforcing the warnings, guys. I can't really afford to brick (or even render temporarily brick) my iPhone right now.

Баста on YouTube (Russian rap artist).

My russian is weak at best. But what little I got was, indeed, hilarious.

Tried to get used to this Kensington Expert Mouse (the one with the huge ball). No scroll wheel == might have to move it back to a secondary. Also trying to get used to this two-monitor setup at work -- I keep overshooting the right side of the screen of the left, primary one.

I would start looking in the professional forums. M-Audio is just the entry level device for that. Apogee Rosetta would be a good choice.

The article is about the MR-1, but there's also the MR-1000 and now the MR-2000S. But I agree with grawk -- look elsewhere. It's probably pretty high-end for its pricepoint, but otherwise limited.

Well, no, you don't have to convert it to PCM, but what you do have to do, if you want to hear it in native DSD, is play it back on the Korg itself, but that's about it. It's a good solution if you want to do nothing but record and playback, and nothing else. I sure hope you can offload the files, somehow, though.

Not arguing with you, the following is a sincere question -- isn't there a natural low-pass filter built into all equipment? I mean, don't they all -- unless they say that their bandwidth extends beyond 20kHz -- limit those upper frequencies somewhat (and when I say somewhat, I mean significantly)? And I'm not saying this as a non-sequitur, I mean to say that it's enough so that it renders this issue moot? I can confirm what you're saying about DSD by the way -- one of the British mags (I forget which one -- either Hi-Fi News or Hi-Fi Choice -- probably whichever one usually does the measurements) was posting an article in almost every issue there for a while about it. But then all the amp failures failed to start showing up (with SACD), so I think they kind of got over it. (I also seem to remember them thinking that it should destroy certain kinds of tweeters, too. Or maybe it was the amp/tweeter combination that destroyed the amp. I don't remember...)

...which only bats can hear.

Actually, it runs on your computer, so...no problem.

You mean the MSB, right? I think Justin is the only one who's owned one, but that means that a lot of us got to hear it at meets. It's a world class DAC.

nvm, too

Someone at the PDX meet had a Manley Stingray driving them, a combination I intend to try, myself, perhaps even this weekend. They regularly go for < US$1500, used.

Awesome -- I'm just glad to see someone getting something good out of all of this.

Well, after sampling the new one, I like the first one better, but it's different -- more disco-y, less experimental. Which is odd, because I usually prefer experimental. But it's got a charisma that the new one doesn't -- with admittedly only one listen. I'll probably still get it.

Amen.

I'm not sure it's a good idea to separate out sample rate and bit depth. Typically, there are two things that go on -- I call them oversampling and upsampling. Oversampling is what has been going on for years -- they increase the sample rate, put zeroes in for the soon-to-be interpolated sample slices that don't exist yet, then run it through a digital filter and let that hash it all out, usually at the DAC level. Upsampling (a word some people use to describe oversampling, but which I consider fundamentally different) is raising both the sample rate and the bit depth at the same time (E.G. from 16/44.1 to 24/96), and interpolating the values in between. There are a myriad ways to do this, and the higher end companies (E.G. Wadia, Pacific Microsonics, et al) have proprietary algorithms that are considered by some to be better than others. If these "people", when they talk about the "chip", are referring to the DAC, then not only are they (the inbetweeny bits) not random, they're zero (which strikes me as counterintuitive)...that is, until they're run through a digital filter which does the interpolation indirectly (typically, the in-chip DSP algorithm is just a smoothing algorithm, not an explicit interpolation algorithm). But that's not upsampling (in the sense that I use it), that's oversampling.

I was recently listening to Love Songs of the Hanging Gardens and I forgot how much I dug that album. How does the new one compare? Nevermind, I need to go listen for myself... EDIT: Listening to this, more or less.

Awesome -- you could do Telarc-quality needledrops.

Shit:

Well, supposedly (according to grawk) the PS-1's in a CD3000 sound pretty good. And I'm a closed headphone guy, so even though they're not designed for it, I have to wonder how it will sound. The Koss were only one set of enclosure-donor headphones I was considering. Unfortunately, they're not just drivers, they're the whole headphones, so I may (and so far have) just not. But speaking of design -- all drivers have backwave, so all closed headphones' enclosures are designed to minimize that, I would think.

I love that bit. (a) One of my favorite pieces to play, ever. ( He's right. There's really only one instance of the big chord, and no-one on earth plays it as one chord -- except that guy. It's not even written that way. You're supposed to play the bottom notes, and then -- very quickly, and still part of the same "beat" -- swing your arms up and play the top notes of the chord, but all in one smooth movement, and let the meter/rhythm/time signature imply that it's one big chord. He loses that sense of rhythm, but plays it as one big chord, but it's for comedic effect, and I laugh, so it's funny. In fact, I think even heard a version recently where the pianist (someone famous -- RCA Living Stereo? I forget...) plays it as two beats. Yuck.