Way to not answer the question. Not that I disagree with the argument about DDT/malaria but there is also the question that if DDT wasn't in the market place depressing prices that maybe ramped up production of other less environmentally damaging alternatives would drop the prices of these.
The issue I have with Glen beck is that he doesn't judge the quality of his source before passing it on to his audience, this opens him for ridicule. Last time I checked I really shouldn't have to fact check everything from a program that claims to be journalism.
I disagree with this entirely as would most of those "organizers" who personally encourage and praise all that join their cause.
Depends on what one calls radical change. I would argue that there have been lots of radical changes to many things in the US system from deregulation to Roe vs Wade without an attached crisis.
As far as the argument that these small changes make no difference and only make the tree-huggers feel better, that depends on how many tree-huggers there are doing it and congratulating other tree-huggers and converts when they do it too.