October 10, 201015 yr comment_394355 I don't know how many of you saw these already, but I'll post them anyway. I'll list the Exif for picture 2, as that's the better one. Pentax K-x, | f/13 | 1/40s Shot in Aperture Priority with automatic white balance (Yes, I'm lazy.) RAW conversion in Lightroom, no other postprocessing. Taken with Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8 Macro WR. Entry level DSLR bodies and pro-level glass actually make an awesome combo. Oh, and one more thing: Yes, I know I need a sensor cleaning. Report
October 10, 201015 yr comment_394410 Took tons of pictures today at the Bronx Zoo. Everyone with a Canon should have a 70-200 in the bag. Report
October 10, 201015 yr comment_394414 Nice shots, Jeff. I especially like the last monkey one. Everyone with a Canon should have a 70-200 in the bag. I wish I had one (along with a new bag so 70-200 would fit). Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394445 Thanks for sharing those pics. I was particularly hypnotized by orange color part around the toucan's eyes for some odd reason. Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394612 Columbus Day Parade Pics. Miss New York Some random hot girl Miss Somewhere in Long Island One of the candidates for NY Governor And the other Some Italian Dude Random High School Girl Really happy Italian Lady Presidente of the Handlebar Mustache Club and his crazy wife Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394623 Took tons of pictures today at the Bronx Zoo. Everyone with a Canon should have a 70-200 in the bag. Nice shots Jeff. I always have my 24-70 and 70-200 in the bag with the 5DMkII. I loves them both. Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394652 I'd love to see a 50-120mm f/4L or f/2.8L. I feel like I'd use that just as often as the 70-200 and 24-70. 17-40L on 400D. Only contrast and color balance in post. Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394657 I had a line of one of those locally to try out but never got the pick up scheduled. I don't think I would use it much but it would have its purposes. Especially on the FFs. Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394674 Considering you already have 24-70 & 70-200, I doubt you'd use it either. I want one eventually so I can just carry it and 10-22 when I'm out and about, instead of carrying my primes. EDIT - I supposed I'd be able to do the same with 24-70, but I want bit more reach since longest focal length I've got now is 85. Edited October 11, 201015 yr by Salt Peanuts Report
October 11, 201015 yr comment_394680 Considering you already have 24-70 & 70-200, I doubt you'd use it either. I want one eventually so I can just carry it and 10-22 when I'm out and about, instead of carrying my primes. EDIT - I supposed I'd be able to do the same with 24-70, but I want bit more reach since longest focal length I've got now is 85. Been considering getting a 24-105 as well... in theory I think it would be a great outdoor walk-around with the coverage it can provide. Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394698 24-105 is great, but 50-120 would be better, if it could be as sharp as the other 2. The 24-105 is about par with the 17-40 in terms of optics. Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394699 My lenses so far are the kit lenses for the Nikon D50--18-55 and 55-200. I also have the 35mm fixed. I would much prefer an 18-200. Is the basic Nikon one a good lens? Any other suggestions for lenses? I'm looking for something fast that is also forgiving of a lousy photographer. Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394724 24-105 is great, but 50-120 would be better, if it could be as sharp as the other 2. The 24-105 is about par with the 17-40 in terms of optics. Is this statement more for full or crop? Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394814 I could see Canon making something along 50-120 range in EF-S mount as that would approximate 70-200 for their crop sensor, though it's probably not likely. It would be nice if Canon released more EF-S lenses for those of us not upgrading to FF anytime soon. Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394821 Dinny, check out the reviews here. Nikon / Nikkor (APS-C) Lens Tests I know nothing about Nikon lenses (and very little about Canon lenses for that matter), but reviews here are generally well received. Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394836 24-105 is great, but 50-120 would be better, if it could be as sharp as the other 2. The 24-105 is about par with the 17-40 in terms of optics. So it's not quite 50-120 and not from Canon, but I found these. 691101 Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM II Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon EOS Digital Cameras. Tokina AF 50-135mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX - Review / Test Report Edited October 12, 201015 yr by Salt Peanuts Report
October 12, 201015 yr comment_394896 Yep, I've considered those, but I think in the end, I'd prefer the 24-105 for the build quality and USM. The Tokina is far better than the Sigma but lacks USM. If I end up going Nikon, I will pick up the 24-120mm if the reviews are positive. Report
October 14, 201015 yr comment_395225 Video shot with Canon's new 8-15mm fisheye mounted on 5DII and 7D. Canon: EF8-15mm f/4L FISHEYE USM Sample Movies Report
October 15, 201015 yr comment_395496 B&H Photo for iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad on the iTunes App Store In case you needed an easier way to spend your money on camera gears. Report
October 15, 201015 yr comment_395542 I wish people would post up high iso RAWs for the D7000 already. Seems that everyone only posts up JPEGs. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.