September 9, 200917 yr comment_274692 I love to read and don't mind a challenge but I started reading Proust again and I think he is the most difficult author to read. His sentences are insanely long, often times taking up a long paragraph's worth of space. He also writes with an iron fist. If you're mind wanders for even a bit you'll often times be lost. This is a striking difference between his work and let's say Ulysses where your mind can drift as often as the protagonist's and be on the same page. What author or authors give you trouble? Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274695 Tolstoy is inflated, impenetrable, dull and pointless. Tolkien is the same, but much easier to chew through. And I'll probably get shot through the lungs for that one. Moby Dick was also impenetrable inflated and dull. Don't know about anything else Melville wrote. Foucault is very complicated and advanced and difficult to read even though the translations are good, but thats fact not fiction. Report
September 9, 200917 yr Author comment_274699 Yeah Foucault is a pain I'd put Kant and his monads on that list if it included philosophy. I am in complete agreement with you with Tolkien. I've never been able to enjoy reading his fiction. Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274701 Yeah Foucault is a pain I'd put Kant and his monads on that list if it included philosophy. I am in complete agreement with you with Tolkien. I've never been able to enjoy reading his fiction. Actually, the monads are Leibeneitz, to be nit-picky. Personally, I can't stand Pynchon, something about his prose just makes my mind wander and get lost. Report
September 9, 200917 yr Author comment_274706 Actually, the monads are Leibeneitz, to be nit-picky. Personally, I can't stand Pynchon, something about his prose just makes my mind wander and get lost. You're right, leibneitz originated the concept of monads but Kant discussed monads as well. Report
September 9, 200917 yr Author comment_274714 Ha! Yeah logic has little place in understand how we know what we know. Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274715 Tolstoy is inflated, impenetrable, dull and pointless. Tolkien is the same, but much easier to chew through. And I'll probably get shot through the lungs for that one. Moby Dick was also impenetrable inflated and dull. Don't know about anything else Melville wrote. Foucault is very complicated and advanced and difficult to read even though the translations are good, but thats fact not fiction. I could actually get through Tolstoy (but I usually have to take notes on the characters since I always get confused their names), Tolkein and Moby Dick pretty easily. For some reason I have much more trouble with Dostoevsky. Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274717 scrypt's posts were usually tough to read. But oh so worth it! I miss him dearly. For my vote, I always enjoyed kant a great deal (even knowing nothing of German), so it was never a chore. Orhan Pamuk, on the other hand, is maddeningly difficult for me to get through. Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274735 Ken Kesey - It Bids Pretty Fair is a tough one. It changes character perspective from paragraph to paragraph. Worth it tho. Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274774 Stanislaw Lem -- just...bizarreness (and yes, I realize they are translations -- doesn't help). Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274775 Gene Wolfe has to be some of the most complex fiction (fantasy possibly science fiction) that I have read and best. One can go into it at so many levels. The Series "Book of the New Sun" with the Shadow and the Claw as a great introduction. Amazon.com: Shadow & Claw: The First Half of 'The Book of the New Sun' (9780312890179): Gene Wolfe: Books Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274825 i loved Tolkien as a child, but i enjoy it less and less as i get older. Kant is better in German, you just have to hit the german/english dictionary every third word. Oh yes, I see how that could make for a fun read. Report
September 9, 200917 yr comment_274827 I'm reading Hegel right now, and that's definitely even more obscure than Kant. Report
September 10, 200917 yr comment_274898 I thought Tatyana Tolstoya's The Slynx bordered on unreadable. It was the most work I've ever put into a novel. I'd like to blame it on the translation, but I'm not sure I can... Report
September 11, 200916 yr comment_275434 Ok, I ve seen you guys talk about scrypt, and he posted today at HF after being lauded by Jude. It was hard for me to read but very entertaining. Laughs from a latent Head-Fi'er (Scrypt) - Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio Report
September 11, 200916 yr comment_275480 Yeah, I know, I was just linking directly to his post, just in case anyone only read the first page and thought it was about him rather than by him. And -- oo -- I got mentioned by name. I cried a little. Might have to log in and respond. I don't think he understands that people aren't just daunted by his vocabulary or by his sense of humor, but because they actually misunderstand him, I.E. they hear something other than what he's saying. I know, to the rest of us, it's like, "no shit", but I really don't think he gets that. I am reminded how much I miss him. God. Damn. Report
September 15, 200916 yr comment_276457 I sent him a PM saying hi. I also encouraged him to drop by here. Report
September 15, 200916 yr comment_276472 I used to feel good about reading difficult fiction, but grad school maths textbooks are a whole different world of pain... Three pages per hour? That's a good going. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.