jamesmking

I also have the peak dca75 and several adapters. It can't test at high voltages or currents but its insanely useful for identifying transistor pinoutsand the type of transistor. I have used it several times to identify bad/failed transistors making troubleshooting much easier. The windows software also provides curve tracing which is useful for matching small signal transistors and leds.

Digital-First Retail Limited owns Maplin. the company did not exist prior to 29 June 2018... and has changed the location of its registered office no less than 4 times since then... The original director of the company resigned 6 oct 2020. The accounts only show 2 employees ... so im guessing its a shell company. The accounts is interesting section 476 means no requirement for external audit of accounts, section 477 companies act 2006 exemption from audit and exemption from publishing a full statement.... so the entire financial statement is simply one line current assets, one line creditors amount due and one line net assets. current director is director of 1 other company and previous director of another - all from the same address.

quick heads up KSA1220AYS transistors are now END OF LIFE https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/ON-Semiconductor-Fairchild/KSA1220AYS/?qs=ljbEvF4DwOOJTVoo5AYsWQ%3D%3D 😞 mouser is currently out of stock radio spares has stock farnell is out digikey is out

My guide to golden reference high voltage (grhv) variants Here is my attempt at documenting some of the different GRHV board variations. (this will be work in progress for sometime) feel free to private message me with any additions comments, corrections etc. please note the schematic for version 1.5 has been reverse engineered by me from the gerbers and may contain error(s). location of the gerbers: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B_iJFfZStuVhSE5nOHBVdTByR1k golden reference filename naming guide fat - boards which are wider and have less height than the non fat variants L bracket mounting only same as the non fat variants. fat with S as the last character of the filename - boards which are wider and have less height than the non fat variants and the height is about 6.3mm less than the fat variant. these boards also feature more screw hole options for the mounting the pcb to the case including an option of not using an L shaped bracket and mounting the transistors directly to the vertical face of a heatsink/side of the case. a silkscreen cut line is included to guide removal of the L bracket mounting roles to facilitate direct transistor to heatsink mounting. dual - has both positive and negative hv supply with additional bias and both positive and negative low voltage supplies on a single pcb left - has a single negative hv rail and both positive and negative low voltage supplies right - has a single positive hv rail and bias no new in the filename version - 1.5 boards high voltage starts instantly board has high voltage VAC power. Topology is much simpler then version 1.7 and 1.8 and therefore not considered golden reference. new in the filename actual golden reference boards with extensive post pass transistor regulation. new without sw in the filename- version 1.7 high voltage starts instantly board has high voltage VAC power. new with sw in the filename - version 1.8 or later boards same topology as 1.7 but high voltage will not start until dc power supplied to the cpc1117n no dual and no fat in the filename - minimal width and quite high. NOTE placement of the screw terminals for input VAC can vary considerably depending on if the board is a fat, fat S or non fat. Overview of the versions It is the extensive post pass transistor regulation that marks the golden reference out from the other power supply designs as such version 1.5 and earlier not classify as a golden reference since they lack any post pass transistor regulation. No details of versions before 1.5 or version 1.6 could be found in the gerber archives. Apparently pre 1.5 versions had on board heatsinks and ground lanes but there gerbers and not available in the google drive archive. No schematic could be found for version 1.5 although after reverse engineering it was found that the circlotronps.pdf is similar in topology but modified to support 900V output. No bill of materials could be found for version 1.5 and it is not certain what is the power rating for the larger resistors. All versions have the pcb tracks on the underside with no tracks on the top. All versions have no ground plane ALL versions have bleed resistors to help discharge the high voltage caps although version 1.5 and a few variants of 1.7 use a single high power resistor and the rest two 1/2W resistors in series. All versions have the same basic voltage regulator based low voltage positive and negative supplies All versions have the same bias supply although v1.5 has different resistor values. ALL versions use a LT1021-10 voltage reference All the versions 1.5, 1.7 and 1.8 use a C2M1000170D pass transistor All the versions use a 10M90S pre regulator although version 1.5 controls it with a zener string and 1.7 and 1.8 control with a DN2540. 1.7 and 1.8 are almost identical in topology although 1.8 does not automatically start the high voltages. DC must be applied to the CPC1117N to start. note 1.8 does not have provision for screw terminals for the DC to switch on the cpc1117n. versions 1.7 and 1.8 have more post regulation using a second 10m90s (which is not present in version 1.5) after the 1N4007 protection diode. version 1.5 uses a 10ohm current sense resistor and versions 1.7 and 1.8 use 5.1ohm by default. version 1.5 uses a 10K resistor to ground in the 3 series resistor chain to decide the output voltage, 1.7 and 1.8 use 20K to get 400V output. The other 2 resistors in the chain are the same for version 1.5 and version 1.7/1.8 version 1.5 uses two stn0214 which are replaced by two KSC5026M in v1.7/1.8 version 1.5 uses two stn9360 which are replaced by two BC557B in v1.7/1.8 Known non golden reference boards which are variations or predecessors to version 1.5 and golden reference variants NOTE These have not been looked at in detail by me or fully reverse engineered. The cyclotron power supply series follows a similar evolution to the golden reference. earlier cyclotron psus (circlotronps.PDF) use a variation of version 1.5 topology with modifications to bring the output up to 900V. However since it lacks any post pass transistor regulation it can not be considered a golden reference these psus do not have new in their name. The later cyclotron power supplies have the words new or newver in their name on quick inspection of the gerbers appear to be modifications for 900V of the version 1.7 power supplies, have post pass transistor regulation and may be considered golden reference variants. The filename conventions follows the guide above with dual, single, S and SWS versions available. circlotronhvpowerdualnew.zip appears to be derived from the version 1.7 topology with a similar complement of transistors. On the underside of the pcb there are two additional stn0214 transistors compared to the version 1.7 plus 3 mount points for a total of 500V worth of smd zeners. circlotronhvpowerdualnewer2.zip ditches the zener string and introduces another stn3960 and includes sw and sws variations. The kgsshv8g.pdf power supply appears to be an predecessor version of version 1.5. There are very close similarities in topology including no post pass transistor regulation. Current sense is still controlled by a 2n3904. The pre-regulator is 10m90s controlled by a zener string and a quad of transistors like the version 1.5. However the pass transistor is two parallel fqpf8n80c. The control transistors are 2sa1486 instead of stn9360 and 2sc3840 instead of stn0214. Both types of control transistor are no longer in production and hence the conclusion this is older than version 1.5. Apparently these boards are classified as KGSSHV ------------------------------------------------ Version 1.5 boards ------------------------------------------------- predecessor to the golden reference with no post pass transistor regulation the board uses a single high wattage bleed resistor for each cap uses multiple stn9360s, stn0214s uses a serial zener string for to control the 10m90s pre regulator. LT1021-10 voltage reference based single sided board kgsshvpssicfetdual2.zip this has both positive and negative rails, a simple voltage regulator based low voltage positive and negative supply and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 152.7mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.5 kgsshvpssicfetsingle2.zip this has a single rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2 in topology and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 76.5mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.5 ------------------------------------------------ Version 1.7 boards ------------------------------------------------- considered the first known golden reference board version (given the lack of information on version 1.6) has extensive post pass transistor regulation. the board uses two serial bleed resistors for each cap uses a single stn9360s and multiple BC557B and KSC5026M uses dn2540 and 10m90s for stage early voltage control for the input to the c2m1000170D LT1021-10 voltage reference based double sided board kgsshvpssicfetdual2new.zip this has both positive and negative rails, a simple voltage regulator based low voltage positive and negative supply and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 152.7mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.7 kgsshvpssicfetsingle2new.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and 580V for stax headphones bias board size approx. width 76.5mm height 165mm silkscreen revision 1.7 single bleed resistor for each cap kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleft.zip this has a single negative rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.7 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewright.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and bias supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.7 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfat.zip this has a single negative rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 138.7mm height 103.1mm silkscreen revision 1.71 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfat.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a 580v stax bias supply board size approx. width 138.6mm height 103.1mm silkscreen revision 1.71 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfatS.zip this has a single negative rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.71s kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfatS.zip this has a single positive rail identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a bias supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.71s ------------------------------------------------ Version 1.8 boards ------------------------------------------------- same topology as version 1.7 making this a golden reference board adds a cpc1117n and 600ohm resistor to control high voltage startup the high voltage will not start-up automatically. This negates the need for a external relay for delayed start-up and just requires dc power to be supplied to the cpc1117n (not present in earlier versions) for the high voltage to start-up. if you want the board to power up instantly simply omit the 600ohm resistor and cpc1117n and it will act just like the version 1.7 instant start boards. boards same size as the equivalent version 1.7 pcbs silkscreen 1.8 there does not seem to be a dual version of this board kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftSWS.zip this has a single negative rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightSWS.zip this has a single positive rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a bias supply board size approx. width 76.4mm height 165.3mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfatSW.zip this has a single negative rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply board size approx. width 138.7mm height 103.7mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfatSW.zip this has a single positive rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and bias based supply board size approx. width 138.7mm height 103.7mm silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewleftfatSWS.zip this has a single negative rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a simple low voltage positive and negative regulators based supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.8 kgsshvpssicfetsinglenewrightfatSWS.zip this has a single positive rail almost identical to the kgsshvpssicfetdual2new in topology and has a bias supply has more mounting options for the pass transistor, 4 holes for mounting to a case and can be used with or without an L shaped bracket board size approx. width 138.7mm height 98.6mm (slightly less height than the fat non S version silkscreen revision 1.8

1. part of the headcase experience is trawling a massive number of posts in one thread e.g. the carbon to find out about the grhv. Having a dedicated thread is seen as cheating. 🙂 2. to build a grhv you need C2M1000170D which are out of stock just about everywhere with little hope of being back in stock anytime soon... this is one of the issues delaying my megatron build. I can't comment on any sound quality differences, but there very few options if you want a 680uF cap that is 550V and will fit in a 2u case, i.e. be about 65mm in height or less. 450V or better 500V would be fine for the output cap with 400V output. The + lead of the input cap is connected to the centre pin of the large C2M1000170D. Output cap + lead is connected to the cathode of the IN4007 protection diode that is directly inline with the 5.1ohm 3W current sense resistor.

I get mine from https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Stax-socket-5-pin-Pro-Bias-WHITE-Teflon-custom-made/184601921523?hash=item2afb21c7f3:g:CHcAAOSw2ENf7Jyy

great in the winter time to keep hands warm. not so sure about the utility in the summer and i hate lugging around the batteries.

(I would like to try NOT using my headphones or my ears or any other part of my anatomy) stax amp using multiple parallel push pull ef86 valves.... called the maxi minitron stax amp using push pull 211 valves called the ouch stax amp using push pull 101D valves called the almost-inplausible joking aside, a T2 using golden reference HV supplies (capable of the required +-500V and -560V) and only modern components.

if the case has no letter/other designator for the grading then it's almost certainly a fake, (or possibly a reject?). The only time cases for transistors don't have an indication of Beta/hfe/gain or whatever the manufacturer uses to bin and sort them is if the manufacturer does not bin and sort them... e.g. 10m90s, C2M1000170D etc etc.

If you are a reviewer maybe its a problem. If your aim is to get enjoyment from listening to music and your enjoyment is improved by hi-end hifi equipment that you can afford to buy then no it's not a problem. There is far more to enjoying music via hifi than just frequency response... dynamics, detail, stereo imaging, pure emotional enjoyment, good bass.... Im almost 50 years old and I don't have any meaningful response above 15K and above about 13k im getting rolloff. Do I care... only as much as that like everything else reminds me I am mortal and slowly falling apart. I can still appreciate a T2 over a blue hawaii, a panasonic fr cap over a simlic, a philips nos ecc88 over a electro harmonix 6922.... (or I think I can which for me boils down to the same thing for me). I think that if I was 20 and applied a 13khz high slope cut off I would be appalled at the results. Now I am more than twice that age I live with it. For me what does not make sense is to get into debt for my enjoyment of music. Could I buy a blue hawaii se new... from savings yes... would I no. Would I get a bank loan for one... no way ever. Would I spend time and money over many months buying the tools and skills to build one.. yes and I did. Audio is a journey, I learnt a lot and thanks to that journey I ended up with a T2.... Perhaps Tyll is going through some life changes... it takes a lot of guts to sell almost everything and go "walk about", mid-late life crisis? who knows his real motivations, but sure as heck I would not be satisfied with a bose mini system. what drives me nuts is my hifi never sounds exactly the same day to day week to week... is it me or the hifi, or some environment condition don't know... I just want every day to be one of the "special magic" sounding days, My 2p worth. It's certainly true you do need a bit of a thick skin here sometimes. a few days ago I tried to answer someone's question and got chewed up a bit, I think the chewer either misunderstood what I was trying to say or just wanted to flex their superior electronics knowledge. Made I was angry and hurt for a day or so but there are lots of different personalities here, in the future I will avoid them. I have got so much out of this forum it more than balances out.

using mousers parametric search I can't find any vishay resistors !% 50ppm 1/2w 350v working. koa mf1/2 series are same ppm, working voltage and wattage and similar size. https://www.mouser.co.uk/KOA-Speer/Passive-Components/Resistors/Film-Resistors/Metal-Film-Resistors-Through-Hole/MF-Series/_/N-7gz41Z1yzvvqx?P=1yzbppyZ1z0zlrrZ1z0ynpy I use them interchangeably with the Xicon. Xicon is far cheaper if you don't mind buying 100. koa is an option if you want to buy just a few. Per resistor koa is more expensive than the xicon. vishay MBB02070C are close to the xicon 1% 50ppm 350V working but 0.6W https://www.mouser.co.uk/Vishay/Passive-Components/Resistors/Through-Hole-Resistors/Metal-Film-Resistors/MBx-SMA-Professional-Series/_/N-7h7zb?P=1y97ob9Z1z0jjxqZ1yzrof0Z1z0x6pwZ1z0zls5Z1z0wljo (I have not tried these resistors)

1. I assume the poster was referring to a circuit diagram NOT the marking on the case of a transistor. 2. I could not be bothered to see if the transistor in question was a bjt, mosfet or whatever. I probably should have put a / between the hfe and the word gain to cover more options. 3. Almost all of kevins circuit diagrams do not specify the transistor gain variant.... 4. I just had a conversation today with someone about transistors and almost every transistor we mentioned we did not put the gain letters on the end because it did not matter for the purposes of the conversation. 5. I completely agree if we are talking case markings then there should be a letter code on lsk389. starcat where you referring to transistor cases without the gain letter or just lsk389 in a circuit diagram or in conversation?

lsk389 generic name when you don't need/want to talk about the hfe gain.

mains line voltage varies by +-10% or more, transformer output varies with load 10Vac on 475Vac is not going to make much difference....

Glad to help starcat. The Megatron build is in the early stages. Im taking this one slowly because I have been suffering from work related stress for a while now... and don't have the energy to work at my usual build rate. I have reverse engineered the gerbers, built my own circuit diagram and edited the gerber files to my build style. But have not ordered any pcbs yet. Worse im going to use golden reference HV supplies and the world seems to be out of stock of C2M1000170D pass transistors and I don't have any spares. 30 to 40 non fake 2sc3675 ..... wow.... I have a total of 6 in my parts inventory and they came from ebay, I tested them with a breakdown tester and they look ok but that's still no guarantee they are originals. Spritzer on the forum helped me source the transistors I needed for the mostly modern T2 build (he runs a company building stax amplifiers and has a large stock of original genuine parts) but some of the transistors for an original t2 build are getting very very rare. You might want to private message him and see if he is willing to sell you any nos transistors you need. I only asked for very small numbers - just enough to build the T2 plus a spare set in case I messed up. I have also replied to you diy t2 post with a breakdown of what the different versions of the T2 are and the gerbers for them. I assume you are going original T2 rather than the mostly modern version...

I built a blue hawaii with golden reference HV supply and the simple voltage regulator based lv supply built into the golden reference hv board. Later I added a golden reference lv supply which improved the sound a bit. I also replaced the diode bridge on the LV with a synchronous rectifier for even lower noise. The blue hawaii is a very good amp. Far better than anything I had listened to previously and was a quite straightforward build I did not modify any of the gerber files. I did solder the leds, the resistors you need to measure the voltage across to set the constant anode current and the adjustment pots onto the top side of the board for easy checking and adjustment. I managed to fit everything into one 400mm deep disapante case The T2 build is by its nature almost twice the size of the blue hawaii and of course more expensive. The pcbs are bigger, there's more values and components and more power supply rails and multiple transformers etc. I also had to modify the gerbers to fit my build style, selected volume pot and the case I wanted to fit the amp into. The T2 is just magical and is my daily listening device. If you only have the time and resources to build one build the T2 and get the best to begin with. I don't regret building the blue hawaii but I have not listened to it since I built the T2. I found the T2 build to be big but not difficult. I read the forum posts carefully followed their advice and used xicon resistors and ultrasonically cleaned the pcbs. I also measured every component with a LCR meter and transistor tester etc before soldering them in and checked everything multiple times... I even tested the zeners and diodes and matched all components between channels and between + and - halves of a channel. I actually finished the pcbs about three weeks before I switched the amp on.. I got locked into a cycle of checking and rechecking everything and was convinced I would get sparking or noise batteries. So far I have had no issues at all with the amp and the initial fear I felt from reading the forum posts on failed T2 builds has dissipated. most importantly the T2 has 4 more glowing valves than the blue hawaii and so looks better in the dark... but then the megatron has even more valves

All the T2 amp boards are a single monolithic slab (except the version I modified). The non shrunk versions are more than 400mm deep and will not fit into most diy chassis like the disapante 400mm. Also they have solder pads for a very expensive and now not easily available volume pot. Original T2 uses almost completely obsolete transistors which are both very very expensive (if you can even find them) and almost all the sellers e.g. ebay etc are selling fake parts anyway. t2schem.PDF So if you have not got the transistors already from known good sources you are looking at probably looking at 10-30+ dollars PER transistor and there are a lot of transistors.... The original T2 amp board was massive... too large to fit into a 400mm deep case! so there was also various attempts to make it smaller: t2shrunk.zip Hence the number of different T2 gerber zip files. I would very roughly guestimate budget $1000 just for the transistors for the amp board. If you make a build error and the magic smoke comes out things can get real expensive real quick. Building an original T2 is going to be fraught with danger and failure unless you can find a reliable source of non fake parts or have them already for a know good source. You also need resistors that can handle the high voltages without the insulation breaking down. Xicon 273 series worked for me and KOA mf1/2 seem ok. PRP appear to fail. Joamat plus others worked on a version of the T2 which used mostly still in manufacture transistors but still requires 12 obsolete resistors: staxt2nc3fdh7.zip t2schemmodified.PDF shrunk version 398mm deep: t2shrunk2.zip shrunk version but with solder points for an alps potentiometer t2shrinkedv10.zip This is the version I built. Fortunately I purchased the obsolete transistors from a very well known forum member who purchased them from a known good supplier when they were still available. There is no known version of the full T2 that only uses modern parts.... independent of this there are also three versions of the power supply, (the golden reference power supply series is not suitable because it can't handle the high voltages required for a DIT T2). Joamat et al created a fully regulated version using the lt10 voltage reference: t2250kgsshv.zip t2hvandlvpsukgsshv2.zip (the same reference that is in the golden reference LV and HV boards so I went with this). The other designs use a ref102. t2schempower-2.PDF t2250.zip t2hv2.zip joamat told me the lt10 had lower noise and since I bulk purchased lt10 references I went with his psu boards. I posted the modified gerbers I made and a circuit diagram for the joamat T2 plus power supplies in this thread a short time ago in the diy t2 thread https://www.head-case.org/forums/topic/6837-the-ultimate-diy-a-stax-srm-t2/page/190/. The modifications to joamats gerbers documented in the post to fit my build style (one pcb per channel, no solder points for a pot etc), a few silk screen error corrections and placed a missing track in one of the psu boards and some more ventilation space for the 3W resistors in the psu boards etc etc.

My apologies if this has been asked before.... As normal my first steps in a build is to get the circuit diagram and reverse engineer the gerbers to check them against each other.... looking at the circuit diagram pdf the decoupling caps have been omitted... fair enough, however 1. the circuit diagram shows a single 150K resistor from the led D3 to ground but the reverse engineer of the gerbers has two 150K resistors in series to ground.... 2. the gerbers have two 330K resistors, one each from the 300V line to anodes 1 and 2 of the 21ax7. These resistors are not on the circuit diagram and are used to drop the 300V psu line to down to about 250V for the 12ax7 anode voltage... here is my reverse engineer with components in pink missing from the pdf: NOTE this circuit diagram has not been checked

The Gerbers for my T2 build. My T2 has been working without issues for some months now with heavy usage almost every day so I feel reasonably confident about posting the gerbers I used. (see my previous build posts for more details and photos.). full credit goes to Kevin for the original design and joamat et al. for the modifications to modern components. I simply hacked up the gerbers to fit my build style. The amp gerbers are slight modifications of Joamats mostly modern T2 (his build uses all available components except for 4 of 2sj79 and 8 of 2sk216). My modifications include the addition of screw terminals for all voltages, shortening to fit into a hifi 2000 disapante 2U 400mm deep case, split into separate channels, removal of the pads for the pot, wider clearance between components and the ground plane, instructions on the top side for the adjustment pots. T2 left.zip T2 right.zip (note left and right are swappable I just like the 6922 valves at the front) The power supply is also based on Joamats T2 psu, with a couple of error corrections, there was a missing track and a couple of incorrectly labelled components. also the solid state relay in the HV delay section is obsolete and I replaced the footprint with a standard relay. minus and 250v cleaned .zip cleaned t2 hv and lv bias and delay.zip Feel free to use/modify/ignore. I do find that in the power supplies the 3W resistor close to the film cap and zener ladder gets very hot ~90C on the high voltage tails. I have therefore modified the power supply boards to make them slightly longer and provide more space around this resistor and put some holes in the pcb under it for better air flow. minus and 250v cleaned COMP -560v lengthened.zip cleaned t2 kgsshv hv and lv bias and delay comp lengthened.zip I have ordered a set of these lengthened boards but I have not received them yet or made a build using them so if you are going to use them please check them carefully in case I made a mistake. regards and good building James P.S. looks like next on the list will be a megatron build.

hmmm... interested.... I will have a look at the build thread, gerbers etc...

I have centred the holes and updated my post with a new upload of the gerbers and a new jpeg of the layout. v1.4.zip

they all seem to be classified and mobile phone stereo connectors..... and I guess module phone manufacturers do not care about socket robustness... I checked radio spares - same selection as mouser however farnell has https://uk.farnell.com/lumberg/1502-02/socket-3-5mm-jack-4way/dp/1368639?st=3.5mm 4 pole its panel mount but not really pcb mount 😞 same with https://uk.farnell.com/pro-signal/mj-079/connector-3-5mm-phono-jack-4pole/dp/1267373?MER=sy-me-pd-mi-alte just go 4 pin XLR.....

the nearest i can find has no thread for panel mounting but is 3.5mm 4 pole, no switching. https://www.mouser.co.uk/ProductDetail/Kycon/STX-35331-4N-TR?qs=sGAEpiMZZMvlX3nhDDO4ANdBTK25DNHDLDgQvn584hU%3D is a 3.5mm socket, 4 pole (3 signals + ground) smd (the picture shows a thread for panel mounting but the datasheet says no thread)... The datasheet implies there may be a variant with a thread but the STX-35331-4N-TR 4N is 4 pole No thread... datasheet: https://www.mouser.co.uk/datasheet/2/222/STX35331-334673.pdf disclaimer I have not actually used one of these, I just did a mouser search and this might fit your needs.

I have two blue hawaii se (golden reference hv and lv psus) , two joamat mini t2 (with golden reference hv and lv psus) and a diy t2. I only have experience with them using sr007 mk2 earspeakers. The hawaii is very good, far far far better than the stax srm006 or anything modern stax sells. The mini t2 is better still improving bass, micro dynamics and detail. The diy t2 is fantastic its takes the mini t2 strength and improves on it and adds better macro dynamics, even better bass and detail. If you can get any stax amp get the diy t2. As far as I can tell the sr007 needs as much drive as possible to get the best bass and dynamics and the diy t2 has the drive.... (we are still waiting for Kevin Gilmore to design a single ended stax amp which uses 300Bs or 211s or something even more powerful... 🙂 ) In terms of build difficulty the blue hawaii is probably the easiest (there are two version the original uses obsolete components but the modern version only uses transistors which are still available new), the mini t2 amp boards are almost all surface mount (psu is still through hole) and require precision and a good hot air station. For checking a stereo microscope is very useful. It only uses modern components and costs a bit more than the blue hawaii to build. The diy t2 is not difficult to build (if you use resistors that can handle the voltages) it's just big and intimidating. In terms of build costs the diy t2 is by far the highest. (there are two versions of the t2 one which uses almost all obsolete and very expensive nos components and a more modern version which only uses two types of obsolete transistors.). Either way you need to be aware there are many people selling fake nos transistors which will fail and blow up immediately on switch on or if you are "luckier" fail slowly over time. So you either need a trusted source or a transistor breakdown voltage tester and transistor identifier and even then you are taking a risk... (almost every seller of nos transistors on ebay sells fakes or a mixture of fakes and modern "equivalents" relabeled as originals. In terms of size I built the entire blue hawaii in a single 400mm deep case, the mini t2, transformers in one case and the amp and psu in a single 400mm deep case. Diy t2 transformers and psu in one 400mm case and amp in another 400mm case. (I had to modify the diy t2 amp board gerber files for the amp circuit board to make it fit)...

vpi 16.5 with disc doctor record cleaning fluids. I have cleaned my entire classical music collection (1500+ lps) on it. I have two arm wands, one for the cleaning fluid and a seperate one for the distilled water wash cycle. I also use the disc doctor replacement arm wand pads - a lot cheaper than buying a complete new arm wand from vpi. the machine is not that quiet, there are grinding noises from the motor and the vacuum pump is quite loud but it has worked very well for me. I almost had a keith monks. A hifi shop I used to frequent often was closing (the original owner had died some years before and his son taken over but had died) and his grandson was going through the estate. I went through the ex-owners record collection pointing out some of the more rarer and nicer records (they were all played on only high end equipment, cleaned with a keith monks before playing and mint). The grandson was totally clueless about the value of the lps. I assumed he would either sell the collection in parts on ebay or go to a specialist dealer. I purchased a few records myself (I was fairly short of money at the time) and asked about the keith monks. The grandson said it was for sale but had no idea about the price. At the time I did not have enough spare cash to make what I thought would be a reasonable offer i.e. multiple hundreds of pounds. I found out a few days later rather than ebay it the grandson threw it away! He sold the entire record collection I guess about 750+ lps on bulk dirt cheap to a dealer.... sigh A sad end to my favorite hifi shop. I found a while later that someone passing by saw the keith monks in the rubbish skip and took it.... the hifi shop was in a tiny village in the middle of nowhere so I hope it was another patron of the hifi shop. Even sadder (for me) was the ex-owner had made reel to reel recordings over many years of live classical music radio concerts broadcast on BBC radio 3 on agfa pem368 tape ar 7.5 or 15 inches per second, on either a high end teac, ferrograph logic 7 or a tandberg td 20a reel to reels. I asked about these recordings... the grandson said he had erased them all.... sigh