Cankin Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 I was considering this because I wanted something cheap and decent but his attitude turned me away. I finally got HRT HeadStreamer instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swt61 Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 I think nwavguy and Coconut Audio should partner. Nature sees to it that certain things are destined to meet. The dung beetle and a steaming pile of dung are a fine example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidbasement Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 Dunno, I reckon that there is a little bit of histrionics in there as well. As Gary Larson's Far Side cartoon psychiatrist wrote in his notebook, "Just plain nuts!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobra_kai Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 Not very happy this isn't available for DIY. That would have been my only motivation to get one of these - now I have absolutely no interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beefy Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 Not very happy this isn't available for DIY. That would have been my only motivation to get one of these - now I have absolutely no interest. Oh, I didn't even realise that. I was tempted to build one for shits and giggles, but yeah, no way in hell I am buying one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebby Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 I think the argument that he uses for the pre-assembled boards essentially boils down to: 1) USB and DAC chips are difficult to source in small quantities (and apparently require OEM agreements) 2) Small SMT components and fine pitched IC bring the project to a high difficulty level 3) "Given all that, the ODAC requires commercial automated assembled in fairly large batches." Not saying I agree with it, but that's what he says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deepak Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 Looks like the people here that predicted he would go commercial were spot on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadhead Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) scratch that.... he's a douche. Edited April 20, 2012 by Dreadhead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobra_kai Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) I think the argument that he uses for the pre-assembled boards essentially boils down to: 1) USB and DAC chips are difficult to source in small quantities (and apparently require OEM agreements) 2) Small SMT components and fine pitched IC bring the project to a high difficulty level 3) "Given all that, the ODAC requires commercial automated assembled in fairly large batches." Not saying I agree with it, but that's what he says. Yea I read his article but really the argument that fine pitch smd can't be DIY is BS. You can do it with a soldering iron with care or there is always the mask + solder paste method. And I don't see why one of these 'partners' couldn't sell a kit with the board and the couple hard to source chips if they aren't available in small quantities. It's not for everyone, but neither are a lot of other DIY projects. Worse yet he didn't even release the schematic. Looks like the people here that predicted he would go commercial were spot on. Agreed Edited April 20, 2012 by cobra_kai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebby Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 I agree, I think he should have at least provided an option for DIYers. Perhaps release a board with the two chips pre-soldered, like how TPA does most of their boards? The lack of a schematic is particularly glaring in this case, especially when you compare the ODAC to the O2. O2 a full schematic that was CC licensed, while the ODAC has....nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsavitsk Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 His rhetoric is ridiculous, his claims are unfounded and without citations, and his designs are boring. But, really, he has to release his project as a kit for DIYers? I don't see where he owes kit builders of the world anything. Who cares if he makes a commercial design. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But why does this guy have so much power over the audio world? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torpedo Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 His rhetoric is ridiculous, his claims are unfounded and without citations, and his designs are boring. But, really, he has to release his project as a kit for DIYers? I don't see where he owes kit builders of the world anything. Who cares if he makes a commercial design. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But why does this guy have so much power over the audio world? Because he bashes the establishment, "reveals the truth", gives his knowledge and designing skills for free... and the masses love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 I hardly think the "masses" even know who he is. He has a following, but I'm not sure they're a particularly influential bunch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 Because he bashes the establishment, "reveals the truth", gives his knowledge and designing skills for free... and the masses love it. And because he is a fucking, hypocritical cunt. He bashes the snake oil salesman but he is just distributing another flavor of snake oil. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torpedo Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 I hardly think the "masses" even know who he is. He has a following, but I'm not sure they're a particularly influential bunch. You'd be surprised how frequently his O2 and his website comes out mentioned at other sites. OK, maybe not the masses, but a lot of people with an interest in audio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tari Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 He's gone commercial but claims he isn't making any money. Honestly, if he had someone else with even rudimentary social skill and a less conspiratorial bent to run the blog and forum posts while he sat back and designed his product would be better received and his cause would be furthered to a wider swath of people. He's hurting his own cause. Unless his cause is an ego boost through denigration of respected designers - if I wanted to choose a designer to 'expose' it would not be Pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcpoor Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) I see his products and blog regularly brought up and recommended on various forums like Anandtech, Slickdeals, etc. whenever something headphone gear related is discussed. His followers are a very vocal and annoying bunch, kinda like their leader. They present his audio ideology/rants as absolute truth and anything that cost more than his products as snake oil or a ripoff. Edited April 20, 2012 by dcpoor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anaxilus Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 After more than a year trying to add some 'perspective' to NWVaguy on the other site, it's refreshing to see a modicum of analysis and BS filtering still left in the world. Phew, so lonely over there. Poor Amos has even picked up the banner in defense of sanity. I think Purrin said 'eff these Jehovahs I'm outta here'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchro Belt Drive Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) Even if his design would work I couldn't care less. I choose to ignore his creations a long time ago since his review here was obvious enough. I am not a Electronic Egineer or anything. I just read a lot and try to find out for myself how things work. The way 'he' communicates just gives me the feeling he wants to share his absolute ideas with no form of healthy feedback(/criticism). Back to Pink Floyd... Edited April 20, 2012 by Synchro Belt Drive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cobra_kai Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 if I wanted to choose a designer to 'expose' it would not be Pass. +1. He knows Texas Instruments has licensed patents from Nelson Pass right? I wonder how many of his patents a top semiconductor company has licensed... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin gilmore Posted April 20, 2012 Report Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) Just wait till he releases his threatened "timex vs rolex" article. I have no idea whats in the pile of diatribe, but i'm sure there are going to be lots and lots of pissed off people. Something continues to tell me that since he thinks the benchmark is the best thing since sliced bread, he probably had something to do with it, possibly working as a consultant to them. Very few people would pay retail price for something like a dscope, and those that would probably would buy the audioprecision. at least he does not sand off the numbers on the chips. So one could probably reverse engineer the thing in a few minutes. And lay out a compatible board in a couple of hours. The issue would be the availibility of the chips. Since he is all about extremely low distortion numbers et all, you know that he is going to rip nelson a new one, because most of his amps are in the .05% to .1% thd range. Edited April 20, 2012 by kevin gilmore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livewire Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 I could give a shit about the designer's "baditude". A Sabre DAC for a C-note? 100 samolians? No brainer, I'm in. If it actually sounds good, then fuck yeah! If not, I'll flip it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebby Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 (edited) It's important to note it's only the 9023 dac, so it's not that great of a deal. Given nwavguy's following though, you shouldn't have any issue flipping it. Edited April 21, 2012 by Nebby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currawong Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 Guys, share that cool free gear! I'd really love to know where all these free headphones are I'm supposed to be getting as I am having trouble finding them. And because he is a fucking, hypocritical cunt. He bashes the snake oil salesman but he is just distributing another flavor of snake oil. ^ This. His writing is so sensationalist -- I read a comment about his Headphonia article where the poster said it reads like a scientific article. That was rather scary. No self-respecting scientist would write like that. Some in-it-for-the-money scientists have written books like that though. The biggest irony is that the same people who would tell anyone to be sceptical about manufacturer claims aren't the least when it comes to him and his claims, measurements or otherwise. "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." --- Richard P. Feynman My father wrote a book explaining how science works (though related, mostly, to biological sciences). I have asked the publisher to re-release it as an eBook. If it can help educate people I think that will good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grawk Posted April 21, 2012 Report Share Posted April 21, 2012 nice anonymous throw away account. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.