Pars Posted March 26 Report Share Posted March 26 For RK50, you can look at Octopart here: https://octopart.com/rk50114a0001-alps-7850315. Otherwise, the TKD 4CP2500s are well thought of, and the 4CP601s aren't too far behind. Much cheaper. As for board placement, I would guess those that place the board at the rear do so to keep them close to the input jacks (noise). This would normally require that the volume pot use a shaft extender and also be placed at the back. For raising the resistors, 2mm should be plenty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reima Posted March 26 Report Share Posted March 26 Thanks Pars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwmclean Posted March 26 Report Share Posted March 26 6 hours ago, Reima said: I see some builds have the amp boards at the back of the chassis and others at the front. Is there any benefit (sonic or otherwise) to putting them at the front or back? As a rule of thumb try and keep the transformer as far away from the amp boards as possible. Board placement depends a great deal on whether you’re building a two box or one box chassis. Implementing a two box with an an external psu you do have the luxury of having the amp boards at the back close to the inputs and like Pars mentioned you can then use a long shaft for the volume pot. Btw I’ve not had any had hum issues when using fully encapsulated transformers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reima Posted March 28 Report Share Posted March 28 @johnwmclean thank you. I should have taken the hint from the DIY T2 where the volume pot etc. are at the back of the chassis. I will most likely go with an external psu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reima Posted April 5 Report Share Posted April 5 I have completed the GRLV, have not tested it as yet, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pars Posted April 13 Report Share Posted April 13 Tested the two C2M devices I pulled out of the Carbon board last night on one of those cheap chinese device testers. One of them tested as an NPN, the other as a MOS FET. Another new one tested as a MOS FET as well, so guessing the one that thought it was an NPN was the bad one. Tossed it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MLA Posted April 14 Report Share Posted April 14 Good riddance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usa_love Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 Hi all maybe someone has a link to kgsshv carbon schematic I try to find, but I find either broken links or fragments of the schematic or documents that are not downloadable here( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pars Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 (edited) a Edited April 17 by Pars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin gilmore Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 i was going to be much less friendly. the file you are looking for is where it should be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usa_love Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 (edited) yes it seems to be a problem with my browser if i just click on the document it tries to load but nothing happens but if i copy the link to the document and open it in a new tab - everything works very strange behavior and the links to gilmore.chem.northwestern.edu seem to be just outdated some of them are quite old, it looks like that hosting is just outdated Edited April 17 by usa_love Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbest Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 PSU for both: Carbon and GG (Ground Grid). With delay board for tubes filaments. Compact 22AWG wires can handle 700v DC, double shielded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.