That's the problem right there. You do, indeed, need to make that distinction. There's a difference between arguments of fact (what is wrong) and arguments of ego (who is wrong). When spritzer facepalmed your post, it was understood that it was his foray into the argument of fact (because he doesn't know you, and we knew that he didn't know you, so it didn't merit discussion). We don't know if this is your own knowledge that you have legitimately accumulated through experience, knowledge you are regurgitating from a smart, close friend (we get a lot of those, too; I'll be honest, I'm one -- I don't know anything myself, so I tend to stay away from technical discussions), or knowledge you may have gleaned by googling (get a lot of those too). (And of course, the ones who have no knowledge, who come in here and expect us to spoon-feed them the answers.) So even if the facepalm was directed indirectly at you for being the source of the information, it doesn't mean it was directed towards you at a gestalt level, since that is but a small crumb of who you are. And you're probably not even going to read this, so I'll just stick this here.
So, leave your ego at the door, argue the technical merits only, until you get an idea of who we are personally. THEN you can start attacking us personally. Well, not really, then we'll ban you for being a dick, but at least you can feel righteous in your exile.