Jump to content

New Pete Millett/TTVJ amp - Apex Teton


shellylh
 Share

Recommended Posts

im sure nate remembers..i spent a lot of time in 2006 or 2007 working on something like this, but never took it to production. just didnt think anyone would be willing to pay for it being done the right way when the hot thing at the time was $300 versions from China. times have changed though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who don't want to read the HF thread:

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmillett go_quote.gif

The Teton has a highish output impedance similar to the original HA-2.  The Zout depends on what output tube you use...if I recall correctly it's around 100 ohms using a 6080, and as low as 50 ohms using a 6528.

 

Of course, the output impedance affects the sound, depending on what headphones you use.

 

I also added an "IEM" mode that trades gain for output impedance, so you can drive 16 ohm IEMs.  This is done with a simple resistive alternator, no magic.  So the gain is dropped by ~15dB, and Zout is lowered to ~10 ohms.

 

Although many would argue this amp is only good for higher impedance headphones (over 150 ohms), personally I find many lower-impedance phones (like Grados) sound better with a higher source impedance.  It depends on your taste.

 

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im sure nate remembers..i spent a lot of time in 2006 or 2007 working on something like this, but never took it to production. just didnt think anyone would be willing to pay for it being done the right way when the hot thing at the time was $300 versions from China. times have changed though!

 

I believe that I have a prototype PCB tucked away in a drawer somewhere for the amp section. :)  Hopefully this will drive tube prices in a direction that allows you to think about selling some of your 421A collection. 

 

And I still think that the way to bring this type of amp to market is to do it like the TTVJ 307A and trafo couple the inputs and outputs and call it balanced.  Yes, it adds cost but the additional market created is worthwhile.  I also loved the Menace TC and if time/money permited it'd be the version that I'd build again with premium parts.  That was kind of where the thought process for Frankstein started...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i still have all of the 6AS7, 6080, 6528, 5998, and 421A tubes that i bought.  the last version i prototyped was a transformer output version, thinking that it would differentiate it from all of the cheap OTL amps with those tubes that had flooded the market - and that i would have to acquire WE 421A tubes to ship with the amp. its still in my storage unit on a piece of wood

Edited by justin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was making a joke about the weight distribution

I think we all understood that it was a rhetorical question, even those of us who don't know you in person.

 

I love this place, sometimes you all have my sense of humor (or perhaps, mine is suddenly sympatico with all of yours).

 

I was also going to point out the comparison with the Wheatfield HA-2, which was downright disturbing to hold in one's hands (due to its leanings).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I still think that the way to bring this type of amp to market is to do it like the TTVJ 307A and trafo couple the inputs and outputs and call it balanced.  Yes, it adds cost but the additional market created is worthwhile.  I also loved the Menace TC and if time/money permited it'd be the version that I'd build again with premium parts.  That was kind of where the thought process for Frankstein started...

 

That would be a plan.  A lot of high end studio gear is single ended with transformers on each end so this makes sense.  Same reason the ECP L-2 should have an XLR output, we now the difference but 95% of HF have no clue. 

 

I'd love to take that amp apart and show how 5K$ amps should be built. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please, elaborate on your vast experience designing, building and distributing high-end electronics.

 

I meant aesthetics wise it looks kind of plain jane. No offense or anything it's got the plain jane look similar to the ALO Studio 6. I want more bling like BHSE level. I do own and like the low-end Jonokuchi so I don't have anything against Pete Millet's designs/amps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant aesthetics wise it looks kind of plain jane. No offense or anything it's got the plain jane look similar to the ALO Studio 6. I want more bling like BHSE level. I do own and like the low-end Jonokuchi so I don't have anything against Pete Millet's designs/amps.

 

I would agree 

However; I would not call the BHSE bling as such, as it uses uses materials in a way which makes it look solid, well finished, there has been considerable thought given to to overall design and attention to detail.

 

The EAR HP4 is much more "Blingy" with all the polished chrome and gold plated knobs 

Edited by complin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the cell-phone level of pictures being provided so far I think it's a little early to make sweeping generalizations about how it'll look in the flesh.  I'll grant you that it's never going to be flashy but it maintains the same general aesthetic approach of the other Apex offerings (Peak, Pinnacle, etc.) so there's good reason for it to look the way that it does. 

 

And Kevin, I think that one of the top mounted bits is a large, first stage choke.  The power supply on this thing is going to be running pretty at pretty high currents (compared to normal tube gear) ~200mA so the first stage choke would need to be a lot larger than the little guys inside the chassis.  I'm basing this assumption partially off of the reference to a "multi-staged LC filter" that is in the product description and partially off of the # of wires coming through the bottom panel.  I also think they're running DC heaters for the 6NS7, which is a nice upgrade over previous iterations of this amp.  I'll be bugging Pete about it more, that much is for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...