Jump to content

Balanced to unbalanced board


Recommended Posts

Is there a balanced to unbalanced (single ended) board that is recommended? Twisted Pear has two options but they use op amps, and then there's the Broskie Cathode Follower, and Unbalancer Two.  Those two use tubes.  What else is out there?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 250
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Messing with this tonight. Its playing into balanced ortho's. the gain is stock at 2 and its just enough, not real loud but sounds just great! yes this is meant for Pre duty, this is on

So I did end up using a female header socket and air wiring the ground. The part number for the 4 pin right angle header is 68016-404hlf. The leds I used are extremely bright orange-red, glad once i c

start laying out your own boards and you will know why. there will be a all smd version at some point with these as output buffers  .8 x 1.5 inch  

Posted Images

21 hours ago, kevin gilmore said:

my balanced/unbalanced/cast to balanced/unbalanced.  but its a pile of transistors, single resistor gain control, and would need a buffer for low impedance loads.

Is that the board that you posted with mention of using it in a modular preamp of sorts?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

The most significant issue with the THAT 1200 series of receivers is noise, -107dBu. It is dominated by the rather large values of noise-generating resistors inside (7k typical). With a good discrete design, or clever use of opamps you can get to -120dBu, which challenges measurement (<1uV in a 20kHz bandwidth).

Edited by Craig Sawyers
Link to post
Share on other sites

He doesn't say what the measurement bandwidth was. Which really makes it a very loose specification. The only hint is the very sharp mains harmonics in the noise plot, which are way sub-Hz in width. To get to -158dBV (-155.8dBu) from -107dBu on a 20kHz B/W you would need a measurement bandwidth of 0.25Hz,

Shockingly badly specified.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
On 10/3/2016 at 9:03 PM, Skooby said:

I've used Jensen transfo for XLR-2-SE.  Not sure it's the best/cheapest method.  May be a step-down transfo's better than 1:1

 

Jensen JT-11P-1 Balanced to Unbalanced Line Level Connections

I think this might be the best solution...  anyone else do this compared to an opamp based solution?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the schematic on the jensen website

http://www.jensen-transformers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/as089.pdf

It will go starting with a dual mono BIII to a passive 1 in 3 out xlr switch box (the transformers will be one of the three positions) to a 1 in 3 out RCA switch box.  D you guys see any issues with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For my tube amps I would need the dampening circuit according to jensen.  For best response it says to keep my cable run under 2 feet.  I might make a box separate for each tube amp.  That would keep the cable run under two feet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any audio signal level transformer has a resonant peak at some frequency, hopefully outside the audio bandwidth, caused by leakage inductance resonating with distributed winding capacitance. The RC network on the output is chosen to damp that resonant peak.

But if you put a cable after it, which has some capacitance, it screws with the damping. The catchall of using less than two feet of cable comes from that consideration.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...