Jump to content

The Official Head-Case Photography Thread.


Knuckledragger

Recommended Posts

5 is the oldest. Then came n. then r. I am guessing the prices are based on that. Is a viewfinder important to you or can you live with live view?

I am not using mine (nex 5) and haven't in a few months because of school. I can ship it over if you want to play with it prior to purchase. But I only have a zeiss 50/2 manual lens so you will need to find an af lens if that is what you plan to use later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nate, If you are interested in a Nex 5, I am plannng to sell mine. FWIW, I bought a 5N at some point and sent it back and went for 5 instead (mostly becuase of some weird noise that the 5N made with video... I assume they fixed this). I bought mine from Jeff a little over a year ago I think.

sure Shelly, PM me some details. I'd love to have it for a trip in two weeks but that's not make or break.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't posted any of my own photos in this thread in bloody ages. I've mentioned on several occasions that I bought and IR-modified 5D. Last week I finally took it out and took some landscape shots.

8205287876_e0d2c938b2_b.jpg

EF 50mm F/1.4 @ F/2, 1/100, ISO 100.

8208240544_49affda29d_b.jpg

EF 17-40L @ 36 mm, 1/60, F/5.6, ISO 100.

8209501577_15264353e8_b.jpg

EF 17-40L @ 26 mm 1/60, F/5.6, ISO 100.

8216323724_38d02c0e19_b.jpg

EF 17-40L @ 17 mm, 1/100, F/6.3, ISO 100.

In late september I worked a party where there was a fire spinning troupe. I spend 2 hours taking photos of them ...and while I was doing that, someone stole my DJ headphones out of my bag. hopping_mad.gif

8042219272_048541dde6_b.jpg

35mm F/2 @ F/18, 0.8 seconds, ISO 100.

8049375093_f81ac02f28_b.jpg

EF 35mm @ F/11, 2.5 sec, ISO 100.

8055684048_c6b0bb4e06_b.jpg

EF 35mm @ F/10, 3.2 sec, ISO 100.

8089030529_3380223be3_b.jpg

EF 35mm @ F/11, 3.2 sec, ISO 100.

8058452453_04cd9a795c_b.jpg

EF 35mm @ F/10, 2 sec, ISO 100.

8205604637_ce71428874_b.jpg

EF 35mm @ F/10, 3.2 sec, ISO 100.

8175831373_705f46119e_b.jpg

EF 35mm @ F/13, 3.2 sec, ISO 100.

Click through for extended EXIF and all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who's getting one?

**BRENT**

I'm holding out for the VR version so I can shoot handheld.

Damn, thats hawt

On a more serious note, I love my tripod like a fat kid loves cake. And all of my flashes too. I think I may like my flashes more than my tripod, but only just barely. What is more love than how a fat kid loves cake? That is how I feel about my flashes, my feelings for my tripods have not changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking of getting a new lens but now I am thinking that maybe I should upgrade the D90 to a D7000 (they are $900 until Dec 15th at BH and other places) instead. I currently have D90 and Nikon 35mm f/1.8, Nikon 40mm f/2.8 macro, Nikon 18-200 f/3.5-5.6 VRII for everyday lenses.

Here are my options.

1) Upgrade D90 to D7000

2) Get the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 and use this instead of the 35mm f/1.8 as my everyday lens

3) Do nothing and stick with D90 + 35mm as my everyday lens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2¢ is that the D7000 is a worthy upgrade. The low-light shooting abilities were game changing coming from the D80 (not too far from your D90). The video capabilities are also going to be better along with, well, just about everything else. Sure, nice expensive glass is great but really, are you going to shoot raw, spend hours post-processing extracting every last detail or are you going to chuck a lens on a body, shoot with pretty standard settings and use the in-camera jpg output? I'm in the latter camp. I'd love to have the time to tinker but I don't and I'm slowly getting over the fact that I can't do everything. Slowly. So I'm content with my everyday first gen 18-200 and occasional super-wide-angle 12-24 and get better pictures out of that setup because I actually use the setup. :)

Translation - door #1. The D90 is ancient in tech terms and the D7000 is a crazy good consumer DSLR body and you've got some nice glass from where I sit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the D50. Much easier to use for me (because I'm a novice), but also much less capable. I think the 7000 is just a little twitchy. It is obviously a very advanced camera, but getting the images you want, at least in my experience, is not a snap. Part of that is because I have advanced in terms of what I want to capture and am still learning, but part of it is that the D7000 seems like it could use a little bit of refinement in its AF system.

EDIT: If possible, I strongly recommend renting one to see how you like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.