morphsci Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 x2 on the grip. Makes an amazing difference, especially given its simple design. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shellylh Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 Yep Canon is what I meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knuckledragger Posted November 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 VPI, I'm curious how you will like the S100 over the long term. The improved high ISO performance is definitely a boon, but I've been wondering if the 24mm equivalent FoV is actually a detriment. Tiny sensor cameras like the S95/100 already suffer massive perspective distortion at the wide end. When using the S95 and its 28mm FoV equivalent, I find it takes considerable care to avoid getting the surreal cartoony look of such a wide field of view on in a tiny format. Of course it's possible to zoom in the S100, but there are two caveats to that: First, it's important to remember than tiny digicams don't freely move throughout their zoom range, they have different "stops" along the way. I'm not sure where the first stop is after the 24mm equiv. wide end. Secondly, the aperture of the lens get smaller as it zooms in. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I suspect the first zoom stop is smaller than the F/2 of the wide end. Beside the control dial, the the F/2 glass on the S90/95/100 is the main attraction for me. Of course, all of the above may be largely irrelevant in real world use. I have no doubt both cameras can produce great results in skilled hands. After nearly seven years of shooting digital, I found I dislike super wide angles most of the time. I'd love an S100-like camera that offers the equivalent of 35mm FoV at F/2. Oh, wait. I just described the Fuji x100. D800 http://nikonrumors.c...ikon-d800.aspx/ 36 fricken megapixels? EWW. Have Nikon learned nothing? Even Canon is backing off on the megapixel war. How about a D3s's photon-inhaling sensor in a body that costs less than $5000? The arrival of the D800 makes the likelihood of a 'D700s' seem pretty remote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron_Dreamer Posted November 22, 2011 Report Share Posted November 22, 2011 VPI, I'm curious how you will like the S100 over the long term. The improved high ISO performance is definitely a boon, but I've been wondering if the 24mm equivalent FoV is actually a detriment. Tiny sensor cameras like the S95/100 already suffer massive perspective distortion at the wide end. When using the S95 and its 28mm FoV equivalent, I find it takes considerable care to avoid getting the surreal cartoony look of such a wide field of view on in a tiny format. Of course it's possible to zoom in the S100, but there are two caveats to that: First, it's important to remember than tiny digicams don't freely move throughout their zoom range, they have different "stops" along the way. I'm not sure where the first stop is after the 24mm equiv. wide end. Secondly, the aperture of the lens get smaller as it zooms in. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I suspect the first zoom stop is smaller than the F/2 of the wide end. Beside the control dial, the the F/2 glass on the S90/95/100 is the main attraction for me. Of course, all of the above may be largely irrelevant in real world use. I have no doubt both cameras can produce great results in skilled hands. After nearly seven years of shooting digital, I found I dislike super wide angles most of the time. I'd love an S100-like camera that offers the equivalent of 35mm FoV at F/2. Oh, wait. I just described the Fuji x100. Super-wides (below 20mm equiv to me) are certain to be used sparingly, but they sure can be fun and/or dramatic in the right circumstances. However, in a consumer camera it'll certainly lead to plenty of "no foreground, everything looks distant" type photos, which are certainly very possible even at 24mm. 35mm is coming to be my goldilocks FOV as well. You couldn't pry my Rokinon 35 f/1.4 from my cold, dead hands at this point; what an amazing lens it is. Canon sure has been ruling the roost as far as truly pocketable photographers cameras go with the S90-95-100 progression. Nikon made a laughable attempt with the P300 (or whatever the hell they called it), and all the other possible competitors are just too big to truly be comparable. I wonder who will step up to the challenge, and take on Canon in this arena. Based on past and current performance, it might just be Fuji. The F30 was the S90 of yesteryear, and their latest cameras have kept people buzzing. 36 fricken megapixels? EWW. Have Nikon learned nothing? Even Canon is backing off on the megapixel war. How about a D3s's photon-inhaling sensor in a body that costs less than $5000? The arrival of the D800 makes the likelihood of a 'D700s' seem pretty remote. I still don't believe the idea that the D700 successor will be 36mp. I suppose there is an outside chance (to compete with the 5DII trajectory), but Nikon is generally such a conservative outfit that it would really surprise me. Really, I'd be surprised that the D700 line would get such a major update before the D3 line's next major update, at least based on Nikon's past history. I still think it is more likely that we get an 18-20mp D4 with D3s or better noise levels first. If Nikon did release a D700 update before a D4, I'd think it would inherit either the D3s or D3x sensor. Perhaps they'd even introduce a D4 and D4x, with D700 successors claiming both now-obsoleted sensors. But this 36mp thing just doesn't strike me right. Nor do the supposed D800 pictures, which look quite fake indeed. Perhaps I am way off, but it just doesn't seem like Nikon's MO to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted November 25, 2011 Report Share Posted November 25, 2011 Took the new 16-35 out for a few minutes on this beautiful afternoon. Updated skyline with the Freedom Tower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 I also got my tracking number for my new tripod on Friday from RRS. I guess they got something different out of our last conversation than I did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 (edited) ^ So I take it they didn't actually cancel your order? Edited November 26, 2011 by Salt Peanuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shellylh Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 (edited) I also got my tracking number for my new tripod on Friday from RRS. I guess they got something different out of our last conversation than I did. Glad I bought my RRS L-plate second hand. Edited November 26, 2011 by shellylh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 No they did not cancel. I am kind of glad as I went and looked at the competitors and I did not find anything that seemed to be built at anywhere near the standards of RRS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadhead Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 (edited) Double post Edited November 26, 2011 by Dreadhead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadhead Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Not even gitzo? I have one of theirs and it is awesome. The rrs ball head is supposed to be the best though. I have the kirk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 While I do not see enough difference to necessarily account for the price difference between Gitzo and RRS, the actual working pieces/mechanisms seemed to be of better quality on the RRS as did the weight vs. support strength comparo. The other tripod that I saw and liked was the weird 3 Legged Things line, "Bryan" and "Eddie" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knuckledragger Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 I've never used the EF 28mm F/1.8, but it does have a nasty reputation for softness and eye-gouging CA. I'm surprised how much Kai liked it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 That guy is amazingly annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knuckledragger Posted November 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 That asshat persona is part of Kai's schtick. He's a divisive character, but (unlike, say, Ken Rockwell) he provides a fair amount of useful info and is clearly aware that he might come across as a jackass. You know what I haven't done in this thread in forever? Post some fricken photos. Time to rectify that. Late last month (right before the Epic Snow Storm and week without power), I worked a gig in an old mill in Holyoke. The headliner in the main room was DJ Frankie Bones. For a variety of reasons, he was really late getting to the venue, and was only able to DJ for 20 minutes. He negotiated a deal where he'd go back to the promoter's house and DJ to a small crowd in exchange for most of his fee. Even though I was absolutely exhausted after working for 12 hours (no lie) in the club, I drove to the promoter's house (which was in the wrong direction for me) and heard Frankie spin for 2 solid hours. He didn't half-ass it either. I'm pretty jaded toward electronic music and what most DJs spin, and it's rare when I hear something that really impresses me. Frankie delivered on all counts. This was the crowd during Frankie's abbreviated set in the nightclub Silhouette of Frankie spinning in the promoter's loft. The light source was two LED fixtures I lugged in as well as a diffraction grating laser. Lights in the main room, which was really rectangular. Diode lasers have really revolutionized the industry. A gas laser this bright would be one or two colors and consume 20A at 240V (and require serious cooling). This unit pulls 200W. A very exuberant crowd. Serious liquid sky. I didn't precisely plan to frame the DJ with a silhouette of the crowd, but if anyone asks, "I meant to do that." The promoter, who DJed pretty early in the evening. As per usual, Katherine the dancer was present. Of course, that's not all I've been up to recently. I can't remember if I posted this here before or not. Taken on day 6 days six of the power outage. At that point, most of the town has had its power restored. Not on my street, however. The workers hadn't even started repairing the damaged lines. My neighbor has a generator, which was a welcome relief I have no doubt. Why he used it to power the lanterns on either side of his gate, I am not so sure. 30 second exposure using a Nikon E Series 75-150mm, stopped all the way down and a REALLY shitty tripod because I couldn't find my good one in the dark. Not the best sunstar picture I've taken, but it did document an absurd situation. I ...had planned on added a few more pix, but Flickr just did me a favor and went tits up. Other photos will have to wait for another post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon L Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 That asshat persona is part of Kai's schtick. He's a divisive character, but (unlike, say, Ken Rockwell) he provides a fair amount of useful info I enjoy these video schticks as funny breaks, but Kai isn't exactly very systematic or quantatative in his evaluations. For example, the 28 f/1.8 review really should have at least mentioned the Canon 35 f/2 as a cheaper, sharper alternative.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanDragon Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 http://arstechnica.com/apple/guides/2011/11/can-the-iphone-4s-replace-a-real-digital-camera-for-many-yes.ars/1 Seeing that I have a 20D, found that rather interesting. **BRENT** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cankin Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 Many interesting pictures found on Google Street View http://9-eyes.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 Some nice prices on Canon lenses over on B&H. For example, you can buy a brand new 35L for $1250 (w/ free shipping), which is the usual going rate for an used copy. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/SLR-Camera-Lenses/ci/8004/N/4232860665 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeymad Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 Many interesting pictures found on Google Street View http://9-eyes.com/ took a while to get through - but I liked it... the way google sees the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon L Posted November 28, 2011 Report Share Posted November 28, 2011 (edited) Some nice prices on Canon lenses over on B&H. For example, you can buy a brand new 35L for $1250 (w/ free shipping), which is the usual going rate for an used copy. http://www.bhphotovi...04/N/4232860665 There is $300 instant Canon rebate going on for the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 Mk II, going at $2074 shipped at Amazon for example. shouldn't, wouldn't, can't, too big, too heavy, too expensive... **EDIT** Oh, Snap! I just found a better deal on the 70-200 MkII with $400 instant rebate. I shouldn't, but this is too good a deal to pass up, especially since I expect I can get more $ for this lens later on the used market. Ordered one! http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&SID=227683&sku=832149&AID=10605978&PID=404255&is=USA&A=details&Q= Edited November 29, 2011 by Jon L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VPI Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Looks like it is time to buy more lenses. The 70-200 mkII is the best thing Canon makes as far as I am concerned and I could not imagine selling mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltron Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 I just may have to sell my mkI and get the mkII from B&H. Sweet deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 Dew eet, Al! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon L Posted November 29, 2011 Report Share Posted November 29, 2011 (edited) All right, the 70-200 mkii will be here on 12/5 (free shipping). What would be the least expensive ballhead with minimal slippage with the 70-200mm mkII plus 5d mkii (or iii)? Looking at the Giottos MH1000-652 for $100 http://www.amazon.com/Giottos-MH-1000-Independent-Panning-Release/dp/B000I6UV1Y/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1234767547&sr=8-1 Edited November 29, 2011 by Jon L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.