September 9, 200817 yr New case design, 32GB for $399. 16GB $$299, 8GB $$229. Too bad they can't discover funnest isn't a word.
September 9, 200817 yr Throwing in the Nike+ functionality out of the box is nice if you run. Agreed, but I kept my nano just for that purpose.. the touch is too big, IMO, to run with.
September 9, 200817 yr Heh, back when I used to run (a LONG time ago) I used a big clunky cassette walkman .
September 9, 200817 yr Author Color me meh, I don't see anything in the new touch that would motivate me to buy one over what I already have. The speaker would almost assuredly be rendered moot by any sort of functional case and the volume buttons might get lost there as well.
September 9, 200817 yr Heh, back when I used to run (a LONG time ago) I used a big clunky cassette walkman . Heh. I actually just sold my nano, cause I want smaller. I'll prolly grab a cheap shuffle to suit the purpose.
September 9, 200817 yr Color me meh, I don't see anything in the new touch that would motivate me to buy one over what I already have. The speaker would almost assuredly be rendered moot by any sort of functional case and the volume buttons might get lost there as well. Yup. I wasn't in the market no matter what, but seeing as I bought my touch about 3 months ago, I was kinda hoping for a mediocre release like this
September 9, 200817 yr I was hoping for 64gb Touch. Oh well. Looks like I might have to get the 32gb for now. And maybe a Nano to replace my gen1.
September 9, 200817 yr Yeah, I like this Nano a lot better than the last one. But I'm genetically biased to favor long and thin.
September 9, 200817 yr Author I wish they'd quit farting around with little tweaks like this and get busy writing an app to play video formats other than *.mov or whatever quicktime uses. Having to transcode everything blows.
September 9, 200817 yr I was hoping for 64gb Touch. Same here. I wish they'd quit farting around with little tweaks like this and get busy writing an app to play video formats other than *.mov or whatever quicktime uses. Having to transcode everything blows. I'm surprised that there aren't little plug-ins/apps that just does that phone you on iPhon/Touch.
September 9, 200817 yr I was really, really, really hoping they would have new ipod classics with more storage space, as opposed to less . I really hope they aren't planning a gradual phase out of the original, high-volume audio player, cause the competition blows. And I got me a lot of apple lossless
September 10, 200817 yr Author I would bet that Classic sales have been slow since the introduction of the Touch line and that part of the reason they didn't bump capacity on the Touch at this point was to try and prop up sales of the Classic. Of course they went and dropped the price of the Touches which isn't going to help the matter.
September 10, 200817 yr Really loving iTunes 8 grid view. Be interested to hear how well it deals with a really big library, though.
September 10, 200817 yr Disappointed that they decided to phase out the 160 gig: I'm already at 111 gig for my 160gig, so 120 gig definitely ain't cutting it. And this is not even encoded in ALAC, only at 192.
September 10, 200817 yr Really loving iTunes 8 grid view. Be interested to hear how well it deals with a really big library, though. Bit annoying, actually. Reminds me of the last interface change iPod went through - looks pretty and neat, but slows down the overall operation without really adding anything functional, unless, of course, you happen to be someone who remembers albums by their covers. Also, it's doing weird things to all my albums that have multiple artists/performers.
September 10, 200817 yr Also, it's doing weird things to all my albums that have multiple artists/performers. Yeah, that's annoying. There must be a way to edit the metadata to collapse those to a single listing of your choice. Sure some bright spark will figure it out within 48 hours.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now