Jump to content

The Headcase Stax thread


thrice

Recommended Posts

I'm sure this has been answered a bunch of times already, but google is failing me today, so...

 

I have a Lambda Nova Signature lying around that needs a bit of fixing. In shipping the drivers have come unglued from the baffle. Upon disassembling it I noticed that the dust cover for the left driver, the one that's glued to the baffle, has also become partially unglued from the rest of the driver.

 

So, uh, what do I do? I've been told I need polypropylene glue to glue the drivers back to the baffle - is that what I do? What do I do about the dust cover? How do I prep the surfaces for re-gluing (they're pretty messy with bits of loose glue everywhere)? What tape do I use to attach the earpads back to the baffle?

 

Considering my talent for preserving bits of machinery in an inoperable state for all time, I thought I'd ask first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any strong glue will work for the drivers.  Polyurethane is what is commonly used as it is very strong and stable but with a long cure time.  Martin Logan use tape but they also use it as spacers. 

 

You can use poly to attach the driver to the baffle but it is very strong so odds of removing them ever again, are slim.  Better use double sided tape as that's what Stax use.  Now theirs is crap so any strong glue that doesn't leave a lot of residue works.  I bought once everything I could find locally and some Tesa carpet glue worked very well.  Two different kinds though, the transparent one which is reinforced with some twine is the best one.  Ditto for the earpads, double sided tape there too. 

 

Now with the dust cover compromised you can expect some squealing.  How much is impossible to tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a normal bias Sigma with one side not working. I'm not sure if it's a driver or wiring issue, TBH I don't care to find out. I imagine the straight swap SR-Lambda -> Sigma isn't too difficult. The SR-303 driver and cable swap looked like too much of a pain. If anyone is interested send me a PM or email.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An hour or so ago I got a brand new SR-007Mk2 delivered to me serial SZ3-2029.  First impressions are positive, the fit out of the box is good and the midrange issues I had with the older Mk2.5 are gone now.  The bass is a joke as is to be expected from a ported design but it is at least mostly controlled and only falls apart at a limited range.  The top end is not as smooth as it should be but it might just be due to the earpad position.  More updates coming and we'll see how long I'll last until I've ripped them apart to mod. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On March 6, 2015 at 2:16 PM, spritzer said:

An hour or so ago I got a brand new SR-007Mk2 delivered to me serial SZ3-2029.  First impressions are positive, the fit out of the box is good and the midrange issues I had with the older Mk2.5 are gone now.  The bass is a joke as is to be expected from a ported design but it is at least mostly controlled and only falls apart at a limited range.  The top end is not as smooth as it should be but it might just be due to the earpad position.  More updates coming and we'll see how long I'll last until I've ripped them apart to mod. 

 

Hi Birgir:

 

This is very encouraging to hear for me and very timely.

 

I just received my SR-007 MKII yesterday, North America black version, serial # SZ3-19xx. First pair of Stax electrostatic can I own so I have no reference and no way to assess how it compares to the different versions of SR-007. 

 

This is my first foray into the electrostatic and I don't even have a proper amp to use - currently in the process of building a KGSSHV. All I have on hand is a SRD-7 (normal bias) hooked up to an old Quad 405. I'll be converting the SRD-7 to pro-bias (thanks again for your help) to serve as an interim solution.

 

I eagerly await your findings.

Edited by mwl168
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do have a point there and I know that this is a purely psychological phenomenon.  It doesn't exist in the sense that we can't measure it, caps don't magically change after being charged/discharged a few million times (100 hour burn in).  It is also a pure fallacy to think that a one 5 minute session with any component will give you an an accurate impression of its signature, our senses simply aren't that good.  They also just make up shit and lie to us... those fuckers...  :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Stax newbie myself, it took while to fully appreciate the depth of nuances that my SR-009 deliver over dynamics. Had them 6 months and still experiencing new aspects to the SQ. Whether that is measurably "real" or not, I don't know or even care. Just makes each listening session with them enjoyable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even those of us "burdened" with experience (paraphrasing my favorite saying in Icelandic) still get a bit lost sometimes by just how good this stuff is. 

 

What bothers me about the whole burn in crap is this assumption that our senses and auditory memory are perfect but components made to tight specs somehow drift in a way that can't be measured but is clearly audible.  It took me two weeks for the shine of the HE90 to wear off and I've only become more critical in those 10 years. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is something called "new toy syndrome", but do capacitors not take a while to settle? About a month ago, my Pioneer M22 with newly fitted electrolytics took an hour to warm up before the channel imbalance would go away, now that warm up time has all but disappeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure so called burn in effect is most likely the user getting more used to the headphones over a long period.I always have this theory about burn in in headphones that I want to try run through. So stop me if it is too silly or improbable.

 

Assuming the manufacturer of a pair of headphones has not ran the driver for a substantial amount of time in the factory, burning in will be the first time the drivers are put under stress experience in normal operation for prolong period.

 

Is it possible that some of the so called burn in effect is the material of the diaphragm adjusting itself according to its mounted tension and nominal load? For example it is probably not impossible for the diaphragm made up of polymer material to slight stretch under constant increased pressure from load. The slight deformation will probably alter the response of the headphones somewhat to a small degree, hence explaining the alteration in sound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The M22 is a class A amp and heats up a fair bit as it warms up, so if it has nothing to do with the caps, then its most likely a resistor somewhere that's drifting I suppose. Just about everything else (transistors too) was replaced.

 

Too bad no one has the leisure to organise a DBT for burn-in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting development on the latest Omega 2 mkII birgir. You also like the latest 009, maybe your hearing threshold dropped 3dB in the highs recently :-P.

 

Seriously, though, it's great news if Stax is back on track with the voicing of its cans. I am always thinking of the day my mkI will go south and what would happen next...

 

arnaud

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.