The first place I saw this circuit was in an electrostatic amp design by Joe Curcio using 6DJ8 tubes, which was published in the very first issue of Glass Audio (Vol 1, no. 0), 1988. That's where I found the reference to the Birt article.
I had to go to the MIT library to find a copy of the article on microfilm. I have it in a pdf file so if you PM me, I can send you a copy. Here is a quote from the article (part II):
"From a discussion of the general principles in last month's article, the requirements for the first stage of a practical amplifier are now fairly clear. We have seen that for good balance and low push-push [as opposed to push-pull] gain, [tubes] V1 and V2 should have a high gm and large anode impedance......
A better plan is to substitute cascode stages for V1 and V2. It is generally possible to achieve a higher gain in this way, and a screen grid supply is not required.
The grids of the upper triodes of the cascode pair require ideally to be at a constant potential relative to cathode. This is not a difficult problem, as we may decouple the grids to cathode, and make the grid feed resistor large.
Alternatively, a cross coupling arrangement can be used as shown in figure 9 [this is the cross coupling the SRX uses]. The operation of this circuit is relatively interesting. When a push-pull signal is applied, it can be seen that the drive to the upper triodes of the cascode pair is applied to both the grid and cathode, in anti phase. As far as the cathode circuit is concerned, this turns out to be equivalent to doubling the gm of the upper valve, and therefore the cathode impedance is halved and the voltage gain to this point is halved. However, the grid-to-cathode voltage of each upper triode is the same as it would be in a conventional cascode amplifier, and the overall gain is similar."
My comments and clarifications are in [ ].
The article then goes on to plot the V-I characteristics of the cross-coupled circuit using 12AX7 tubes, which, surprise, look just like a standard cascode, i.e. pentode-like. You may not like to call this a cascode because it doesn't keep the grid of the upper tube constant, but considering that cascode was originally coined as a contraction of CASCaded triODE, that the connections of the two tubes are the same as a standard cascode (plate of lower tube to cathode of upper tube), the same current runs through both tubes, and that the V-I curves of this circuit are the same as a standard cascode circuit, I don't know what else you could call it. Just don't let those two extra lines confuse you.
Note that the SRX input circuit is NOT an LTP into a common cathode because of the connection between the PLATE of the lower triode to the CATHODE of the upper triode ON THE SAME SIDE. The common-cathode-like connection of the PLATE of the lower triode to the GRID of the upper triode is on THE OPPOSITE SIDE. This is the cross-connection. Take it out, substitute a fixed voltage to the grid of the upper triodes and you have the Hedge circuit, which is a cascode differential pair (balanced) or cascode LTP (single ended).
Given that the gain of the cross-coupled circuit is the same as the standard cascode, I calculated the gain as about 41-42 dB, and an output impedance per side of close to 147 kilohm, using the estimated rp and gain for the low current used in the SRX circuit. That's with my 250 kilohm plate resistors rather than the original 300k. If you use the standard published 12AT7 parameters, you'll get a slightly different answer.
The input capacitance of the input circuit is low because of the cascode connection. The issue is the high output impedance of the input stage into the output tube Miller capacitance. With the 6SN7GTA/B, the Miller capacitance is about 84 pf, and the circuit rolls off above 11-12 kHz. There is about 14 dB feedback at low frequencies, and so the calculated closed loop gain rolls off above about 53 kHz, which is what I measured.
"