November 11, 20169 yr 5 hours ago, astrostar59 said: I am done..... If I had a nickel for every time I heard this... What's wrong with listening to you? You haven't established any credence yet, that's what. If I tried everything that some random stranger on the internet told me to try, I wouldn't have time for the things that I truly enjoy. And I'd have a buttload of Galaxy Note 7s. I've already explained why you shouldn't be the one pushing this. If you persist in ignoring me and in your unpaid shilling, I shall have to resort to stronger words.
November 11, 20169 yr Bah, just use a DAC which has a memory buffer and galvanic isolation. It will sound the same with any input, because jitter will be dictated by the on-board master clock and galvanic isolation will take care of most of the ground/line crud. The only price to pay for this would be latency induced by buffer size. Mine adds 0.5ms. You can't just go spewing out stuff like "USB is dead, because my AOIP gear makes me feel better/different". P.S. Just keep in mind guys, that USB audio can't really be compared to other data transfer protocols which have error correction. USB audio can't do checksums and repeat sends, it'll just cut out, if the stream gets interrupted. In theory you could make an audio transfer protocol which would have a buffer and then attempt resends for bad packages until the buffer runs out. Think - anti-vibration systems on those portable CDPS your cool friends had.
November 11, 20169 yr 12 hours ago, astrostar59 said: Ok so put your head in the sand, Sand has some positive effects on jitter, transparency and bass resolution, in case you don't know. Try it. Really. I'm not kidding. But beware; sand must come from ocean beach.
November 12, 20169 yr 14 hours ago, RudeWolf said: USB audio can't do checksums and repeat sends, it'll just cut out, if the stream gets interrupted. I read somewhere that wasn't the case. You'd get a bad value. Then that was supposedly poo-poo-ed because if you got an error on the most significant bit, the sonic world would end and everybody would hear it. The poo-poo-ing made me very suspicious, because an error on the MSB would be a lot like a zero-crossing error. I've made, well, a few zero-cross errors in editing and nobody ever noticed. But I suspect that one every hundred thousand samples or million samples or so would probably sound like bad sounding digital. All of which suggests to me exactly what you said: Buffer enough to be able to resend resend packets. Why not?
November 12, 20169 yr See alsohttp://archimago.blogspot.com/2015/02/measurements-ethernet-cables-and-audio.htmlAndhttp://archimago.blogspot.com/2015/02/measurements-intercontinental-internet.html
November 13, 20169 yr On 12.11.2016 at 9:25 AM, Grahame said: http://archimago.blogspot.com/2015/02/measurements-ethernet-cables-and-audio.html Wow, this blog has amazing essays, if i can call them. Thank you sir.
November 14, 20169 yr 22 minutes ago, astrostar59 said: Forget the techno, just get to hear it. Simple.
November 14, 20169 yr 40 minutes ago, astrostar59 said: Forget the techno, just get to hear it. Simple. it's the beautiful beautiful music
November 14, 20169 yr 6 hours ago, astrostar59 said: Forget the techno, just get to hear it. Simple. Fucking idiots are never done being fucking idiots. You're just repeating yourself now. At this point you sound like you're arguing even if you're not, unless you change your tactic.
November 14, 20169 yr The electrons won't be happy to hear about this. I'd be in for a shock if I were you.
November 14, 20169 yr 1 hour ago, astrostar59 said: Forget the techno, just get to hear it. Simple. Hear it then:
November 15, 20169 yr Ahh yes, the age old "I don't have any leg to stand on, no actual knowledge of the matter but I'm delusional enough to think I'm right so the beautiful, beautiful music will tell all" argument. Classic...
November 15, 20169 yr But but but... On 11/6/2016 at 5:58 AM, grawk said: I think the super audio best friends or whatever they're called is where you want to hold that particular debate, thanks. Fine, but if he keeps repeating himself, I'm banning him.
November 15, 20169 yr oh, this is definitely not the right place for the debate. It is the right place for abusing an idiot. Don't ban him, harrass him.
November 15, 20169 yr I guess I found something exactly same with what is he doing (yea I like Family Guy):
November 15, 20169 yr 4 hours ago, grawk said: oh, this is definitely not the right place for the debate. It is the right place for abusing an idiot. Don't ban him, harrass him. Really? We learned nothing from Trump? Don't fucking enable him.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now