The Official Head-Case Photography Thread.

[Knuckledragger]

In the summer of 2007 I hiked up Mount Sugarloaf in Sunderland.  I went up there many times in the '00s, both with and without a camera.  The view from it is spectacular and really shows off a pastoral and idyllic perspective of the Happy Valley.  The weather was fantastic and there were some hot ail balloons floating around merrily.  Unfortunately for me, on this date I took the always terrible Canon 75-300mm lens and I did NOT know what I was doing.  The photos came out terribly.  I sat on them for nearly 18 years until last month when I sat down and processed them with some modern apps.  I had to make deft use of Luminar 4, Topaz Sharpen AI and Photoshop to extract remotely decent results.  The sharpening was key, and a faustian bargain.  The 75-300mm is never sharp.  I wasn't smart enough to up my 30D's ISO to improve shutter speed so a bunch of the shots have lens motion blur.  The 30D isn't the most sharp thing to begin with in the best of circumstances.  Too much AI sharpening makes for weird and very obvious artifacts.  There is no perfect solution.  With all of this said, the end results here aren't half bad.  I rate this set a solid "Crank up that ISO you dumbass" out of 10.

 

I did take a few shots with the 17-85mm, which is is a Leica rangefinder lens in comparison to the 75-300mm.

[Knuckledragger]

I've been engaging in a bit of a photographic revisionist history/redemption arc.  2006 was a crazy year.  I was working 3+ nights a week doing lights in nightclub (in addition to everything I did all day), and doing other sporadic events as well.  It was mostly fun and I made enough money for it to be worthwhile.  I cannot imagine doing it now.  This was a time period right before LED luminaries became mainstream and most club lights were halogen or arc bulb based.  This meant normal people could not operate or maintain them, so there was a niche I was able to carve out for a one man lighting business.  All of that would change by the end of the decade.

During this time period, I took a ton of photos.  Many of them are really awful.  To the point, the edits I posted were terrible.  I operated under the misguided notion that cropping a tiny section out of a 5MP original (taken with a mid 00s point & shoot sensor) was a good idea.  Also many of the photos were of the partygoers and in my opinion even the originals for most of those shots are just bad.  In 2007, partially inspired by some scene drama, I privated ~1500 photos on Flickr and got on with my day.  There's still a couple people from the mid 00s who have a grudge against me because of shots I took during that time.  (There's a long story here about a garage house DJ I knew who had a very attractive and insanely jealous girlfriend.  I had a photo of him ogling a go-go dancer, she saw it and got mad at him.  He of course blamed me for his dysfunctional relationship.)

Oh wait, I still have the relevant photos:

 

...but I digress.  2006 was also a significant year because it was when I bought my first DSLR (EOS 30D that I made heavy use of for entirely too long.)  I bought the 30D because my PowerShot S60 died ...twice.  Canon were real shitters about fixing it.  I have been going through photos I took in the first half of '06, all taken with the S60.  The process is slow and laborious, but it's therapeutic for me (and lord knows we all need some therapy these days.)  I have been working from the original images (fortunately, I am a compulsive archivist and data hoarder), doing minimal edits and the then replacing them on Flickr.  This is a process that no one besides myself will ever appreciate.  Lucky for me I'm an only child and my primary audience.  As I mentioned above, many of the shots are not salvageable.  Using the built in flash on a ca. 2004 point & shoot while the club is full of fog is a benighted idea in the best of circumstances.  I took a LOT of photos during this time period and it may well be years before I've finished this task.  The following is a small sample:

Spinning fire, Jan 2006.  0.4" handheld.  I had no idea what I was doing.  Re-cropped square but otherwise unedited.

 

Same party as above.  My friend Ed, who is a video artist and electronic musician.  He has a tendency to hold still for long periods of time.  1.6 second exposure, with the camera sitting on  ...some object (I no longer remember what.)  I've got a long story about Ed I might tell some day.  Re-cropped square, no other edits.

 

A slow night at a Sunday event I worked in an expensive but ultimately shitty bar.  4 second exposure with the camera sitting on case.  Cropped 2-3, but otherwise unedited.

 

Same club a month later.  Around that time Technics tried to compete with Pioneer in the CDJ market and made a really weird and poorly received product.  They made for an interesting light source however.  4 second exposure again with the camera resting on an equipment case.  Re-cropped 4:5 (my favorite aspect ratio) but otherwise unedited.

 

Longtime reggae DJ.  He's got a huge local following.  I never saw eye to eye with him on a great many things (I could write a fucking book on that subject, but I won't.)  1/4 second handheld.  I could hold the camera pretty steady for such a long focal length.  The joys of a 5.8mm focal length...

 

Part of the live kit belonging to Ed, the bald fella from  a few shots above.  Not a good photo at all, but the synth gear is too cool not to include.  Sadly, in early 2012 Ed passed out drunk with a lit cigarette and burned his studio down.  That was a very bad day.  Alcoholism is the worst.

 

Same show, available light.  1/6th, handheld.  Re-cropped 4:5, but otherwise unedited.  That blue LED Doepfer Schaltwerk was the stuff of legend.

 

Same gig.  Ed lit up by my 20mW 532nm green 3 mirror lissajous laser.  1 second exposure.  No idea what I used as a tripod.

 

Ricardo, the guy who helped me finish my Saturnine mix in 2009.  Seen here in April of '06, using my CDJ and mixer combination.  I could NOT find that flight case when I moved.  That's somewhat concerning as it's kind of huge.  Half a second handheld, cropped 4:5.

All of this is the tip of the iceberg.  I've probably re-edited ~100 photos at this point.  More later.

[blessingx]

^ Keep posting! 
 

The most hated camera of 2025 will be released tomorrow. Sounds kinda fun. Too bad about the $150 Orange Tax. 

 

[dsavitsk]

.

Edited 17 hours ago by dsavitsk

[dsavitsk]

3 hours ago, Knuckledragger said:

 

+1

[blessingx]

Maybe I was a little cynical on the initial X half reception. 

 

 

 
https://www.techradar.com/cameras/compact-cameras/fujifilms-x-half-is-a-tiny-retro-compact-thats-big-on-wacky-film-photography-features-and-i-love-it 

Edited 7 hours ago by blessingx

[Grahame]

"Fujifilm’s X Half camera is so dedicated to the analog vibes, it can’t shoot RAW"

https://www.theverge.com/news/672268/fujifilm-x-half-digital-compact-camera-fixed-lens-analog-price-specs

[jpelg]

"...you can add a (randomly-assigned) light-leak..." 🤣

[blessingx]

47 minutes ago, jpelg said:

"...you can add a (randomly-assigned) light-leak..." 🤣

For jealous users of other systems you have options https://www.polarpro.com/products/lightleak-lens/ 

[blessingx]

Mr. Polaroid (full doc)