May 27, 201016 yr leaving folk to go looking for their neck muscles It is quite the physical feat for a man to be able to go down on himself...... but for a woman? Wow.
May 27, 201016 yr Why are you guys so sure that that's a woman? Because she has long hair? Isn't that presumptuous?
May 27, 201016 yr Author Why are you guys so sure that that's a woman? Because she has long hair? Isn't that presumptuous? Simple. If a guy could do that he would throw an instant chubby, thereby negating the ability to do that. It's a catch 22 really.
May 27, 201016 yr No reason not to see/hear what happens when you plug the holes temporarily. Also, DAC, provide us with moar impressions! Might be a bit early for impressions... I've just figured out how to wear them properly. And that's with my head in a normal position. Now I am trying to take in how good these make my music sound... no need to think twice about that... these are a joy to listen through... on my CD player that is, they also brutally reveal some flaws in my mac laptop soundcard... They do keep a lot of their goodness also with my poor laptop as a source but the natural tone of instruments suffer, which sounds so great from the CD player. (I suppose I might have to go down to the studio to find out exactly how natural the instruments sound.). It appears they improve on the already great headstage of the LCD-1. A bit less emphasis on air than the LCD-1, and of course bass that runs a lot deeper (I'm starting to think that maybe the LCD-1 has an emphasis on air, whereas the LCD-2 doesn't emphasize... rather than having less emphasis...). A bit narrower headstage than the HD800, but with instruments basically in the same place of course (going from memory, but I memorized some instrument placements one song in particular very carefully.). The upgrade from the LCD-1 to the LCD-2 was an awesome deal from Audeze. It makes me even happier that I bought their LCD-1 to begin with. And I really like that they print a response curve for each set they make.
May 27, 201016 yr Simple. If a guy could do that he would throw an instant chubby, thereby negating the ability to do that. It's a catch 22 really.Incorrect, by a factor of three. In reverse order: (a) it wouldn't negate the ability to do that (might negate the ability to fuck oneself*, but I don't see why it would negate the ability to fold oneself like that); ( it wouldn't necessarily instigate a chubby (I wouldn't); and © we don't know that he/she/it doesn't have a chubby, it's kind of dark there. Now, given all that said -- those do kind of look like women's shoes. * Hard is hard; but soft is impossible.
May 27, 201016 yr Author but I don't see why it would negate the ability to fold oneself like that); ( For those with 1/4 TICE - 1/3 TICE you may be right, but for 1/2 - full TICE individuals it's imopossible. Trust me, I've tried.
May 27, 201016 yr I don't know what a tice is. And I still don't see why it would make a difference. Unless TICE means you're fat. Because the "angle of departure" should help not prevent anything (is that a triple negative?). Listen, I'm sure if you google "autofellatio", you'll find all types -- including whatever a full TICE is -- who have tried and (ahem) wait for it SUCCEEDed and no, that is one that I will NOT lemme google it for you. We should probably split this off into a different conversation so that the googlebots don't classify us as a pornographic site.
May 28, 201016 yr Actually, that picture is really a man's dream. Never again does he have to answer the question, "do these pants make my ass look fat?!"
May 28, 201016 yr Incorrect, by a factor of three. In reverse order: (a) it wouldn't negate the ability to do that (might negate the ability to fuck oneself*, but I don't see why it would negate the ability to fold oneself like that); ( it wouldn't necessarily instigate a chubby (I wouldn't); and © we don't know that he/she/it doesn't have a chubby, it's kind of dark there. Now, given all that said -- those do kind of look like women's shoes. * Hard is hard; but soft is impossible. I don't think I see any balls. For those with 1/4 TICE - 1/3 TICE you may be right, but for 1/2 - full TICE individuals it's imopossible. Trust me, I've tried. I would think a full tice would allow you to not have to bend over at all.
May 28, 201016 yr I don't think I see any balls.That you don't see them does not prove that they are not there, only that they are not there to be seen. I don't think I see any breasts -- does that mean they are not there, or that they are obscured?
May 28, 201016 yr Author I would think a full tice would allow you to not have to bend over at all. Oh you'd bend over for it! Must I keep explaining the concept of Bottom Boy? Your SugarDaddy must be a very patient guy.
May 28, 201016 yr What is tice? I googled both tice and ahem and got nothing check out this month's issue of "Slitz"
May 28, 201016 yr Author What is tice? I googled both tice and ahem and got nothing Tice – tīce. A unit of measurement for an exceedingly large penis. Fractions of a tice used as measurement for smaller peni. Example : Did you see the wang on that guy? It must be
May 28, 201016 yr So how long is 1 tice then? You can't say it's a unit of measurement and not say how long it is!
May 28, 201016 yr Author Sure you can, that's the whole idea of a unit of measurement. How long is a meter? A tice is far greater than an inch, but less than a hectare. How's that? And the usual 'pics or ban' comments might get you more than you bargained for. Edited May 28, 201016 yr by swt61
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now