October 6, 20169 yr comment_742528 Quote 7 hours ago, JimL said: Well, except that for tubes this is a measurable phenomenon. In Glass Audio, Vol 1, No.2, Charles King has an article on extending tube life, and it has a graph from GE that shows the transconductance of a tube declining gradually by about 20% during the first 1500 hours, then stable over the next 3500 hours. And from an old post from Kevin Gilmore on biasing replacement tubes in a Stax SRM-T1, "... new tubes\drift like crazy." That means the parameters in a new tube change as it is run in. Now whether this is audible or not I can't say, but it certainly is measurable. I wonder if NOS tubes that have already been used (albeit many years ago) have already had their drifting? If there is a measurable change then I guess that must translate into a sonic change? Maybe it depends on the circuit in question as to how much that is apparent. The tubes in the BHSE are the final stage, the previous stages are SS. In a full tubed amp like a SET for example, maybe that would show tube drift / burn in more. Only asking, no idea if this is true. Edited October 6, 20169 yr by astrostar59 Report
October 6, 20169 yr comment_742532 If they have already been used, then they are not NOS, they are just OS. Report
October 6, 20169 yr comment_742558 6 hours ago, astrostar59 said: If there is a measurable change then I guess that must translate into a sonic change? Assumption the mother of all evil. In saying that, I can clearly hear the sonic character of new tubes change and settle over the first initial 48 hours. Report
October 6, 20169 yr comment_742560 19 minutes ago, johnwmclean said: Assumption the mother of all evil. In saying that, I can clearly hear the sonic character of new tubes change and settle over the first initial 48 hours. I had similar experience as well. Report
October 6, 20169 yr comment_742571 9 hours ago, astrostar59 said: If there is a measurable change then I guess that must translate into a sonic change? Even if there is a sonic change, doesn't mean it's audible. And just because one person can hear it, doesn't mean another will. I'm not saying it's subjective, I'm saying it's a function of how accurate one's measuring instruments are, and that includes one's ears. And sure, a circuit may or may not make a difference as to how audible that change is. In one example I was told of, the only thing the one tube does is glow. It is otherwise not even in the circuit. Yes, that's somewhat of an extreme example. Report
October 11, 20169 yr comment_742940 Looks like Mr. Speakers has come to their senses and will be using a stax compatible plug on their Ether E headphones after all. I guess they couldn't sell their bullshit logic for a proprietary connector once they were called on it. Report
October 11, 20169 yr comment_742943 On 10/6/2016 at 8:52 AM, swt61 said: If they have already been used, then they are not NOS, they are just OS. This is something that gets ignored so often. Used tubes aren't NOS. Played records (or polished watches!) aren't mint. Worn shoes aren't brand new. Edited October 11, 20169 yr by EdipisReks1 Report
October 11, 20169 yr comment_742944 The Mr. Speakers are loud as hell if you're sitting next to someone listening to them. I've never heard anything nearly that loud before...might as well have a radio in the room. Hopefully they've improved their efficiency and the sound signature. I couldn't believe how high I had to crank my KGSSHV Carbon (450v) to get them to make a good bit of sound. In a way it was damn impressive how inefficient the beta's I listened to were... HS Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742947 Inefficient isn't always a negative. One of my favorite speakers is the Sonus Faber Extrema. But to get them to sing you need to feed them a shit-ton of power (it's kind of like Colin eating a meal). However it is more unusual for a headphone, with the obvious exception of the K1000. Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742951 Well in this case with the new e-stats from Dan sounds more like fail engineering with the drivers not being designed well, leading out to be inefficient as fuck and judging from whats been posted here, sounds like ass. Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742964 5 hours ago, swt61 said: Inefficient isn't always a negative. One of my favorite speakers is the Sonus Faber Extrema. But to get them to sing you need to feed them a shit-ton of power (it's kind of like Colin eating a meal). However it is more unusual for a headphone, with the obvious exception of the K1000. The one that I heard at Canlanta was super inefficient. I nearly hit 3 o'cock just to get to a good listening level. Tom Hankins recently heard it at the RMAF and he thinks the world of the Ether Stats. Maybe Dan has improved it since then. Edited October 12, 20169 yr by purk Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742966 7 hours ago, swt61 said: Inefficient isn't always a negative. One of my favorite speakers is the Sonus Faber Extrema. But to get them to sing you need to feed them a shit-ton of power (it's kind of like Colin eating a meal). However it is more unusual for a headphone, with the obvious exception of the K1000. Not that unusual. The Fostex orthodynamic headphones come to mind as another example of inefficient yet worth the additional current. Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742968 I'm going a bit off topic but, Guys have you ever seen this? A diamond from King Sound:https://www.moon-audio.com/king-sound-m-03-electrostatic-portable-headphone-amplifier.html Rudi from head-fi posted a photo of it with sr-009. I laughed hard when i saw the photo... Is it tragic or funny, or both? Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742972 Yeah, but.... 13 hours battery life..... If you connect a truck battery, you get about a years worth of goodness. What's not to like..... Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742974 This is certainly the most energy efficient way of doing this. No need to deal with the PSU losses from stepping up to 600V or so. Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742975 2 hours ago, kevin gilmore said: chip amp and transformers. yuuk Basically a very expensive SRD-X merged with a battery pack, then. Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_742979 The SRD-X is probably better as the opamps were ok in them. Report
October 12, 20169 yr comment_743025 12 hours ago, wink said: Yeah, but.... 13 hours battery life..... If you connect a truck battery, you get about a years worth of goodness. What's not to like..... 11 hours ago, spritzer said: This is certainly the most energy efficient way of doing this. No need to deal with the PSU losses from stepping up to 600V or so. I love the smell of sarcasm. Report
October 13, 20169 yr comment_743041 The Ether stats must have improved A LOT since I last listened to them to be worth the climb. The good thing is that you and anyone else in the room gets to enjoy your music...at about the same volume you do. HS Report
October 22, 20169 yr comment_743886 Just curious...Whatever/whereever happened to the "fixed" Singlepower ES amp? ES-X amp by drjlo1, on Flickr Report
October 22, 20169 yr comment_743888 its in my basement. unused, as other stuff beats the crap out of it. I suppose I could remove the resistor current sources and replace with cascaded active sources, but really with the power supply it is bigger and heaver than a T2 And the mono volume controls are stupid. Edited October 22, 20169 yr by kevin gilmore Report
October 22, 20169 yr comment_743902 8 minutes ago, morphsci said: Ah memories .... I think I heard electrostats for the first time through the Singlepower ES-1 back in the day, so it has sentimental value ... If somebody stuffs in some CCS and puts it up for sale.. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.