grawk

Which did I say?

nice, how much? I like mine

The duet is hands down better than the DA10

chicken and green beans stir fried in sesame oil with thai garlic pepper sauce over rice

They pretty much are all better than most merlots

cinderblocks

It'd be ironic if canjam09 ends up moving to chicago because of this

woo grawk monsters ftw

It probably would be, but parts matching is a lot more important with balanced.

neutrik profis have the turtleneck neutrik mossad have been circumcized.

that wouldn't be wise, I've talked to him, he'd take advantage of that

survey says, option 2

I don't remember the discussion in question, but usually I'm pretty clear on the difference probably not being from 24 vs 16 bit, but from other factors.

You're not accurately paraphrasing me. I think there's a lot more in play than the bit depth. Sample rate has a lot more potential to be significant, and it's also possible that there are mastering differences between 44/16 and 96/24 bit versions. Not to mention whatever was done to convert between the two sample rates. But 16 vs 24 bit is pretty simple. 24 bits is a godsend when recording, and once done, can be effectively translated back down to 16.

But Ken, he is incapable of making up his own mind. He's from the current generation who learns his opinions from others.

don't bet on that being a good option, or an improvement over the pico.

he is practicing to be a grumpy crippled doctor, cut him some slack

I don't know about you nate, but I'd rather have the dac from the 840c without the transport for $400 than the dac from the 840c for >$1000.

I'm more curious about the analog stage than the chip used as a dac.

yah, I could see it having monitoring purposes in a recording chain.

Yup But it means you can compare dacs pretty easily

interessant

chicken soup candy corn chocolate covered pretzel ice cream

where'd the other 70 come from?