November 5, 200916 yr what you really wanted to say was 6 since 8 makes no sense at all. n items with m versions = n*m , and not n^m This is the first and last time you attempt to tell someone on this website what they meant to say, asshat.
November 5, 200916 yr Are you Blutarsky's official spokesman? It's not official yet. Why, do you want me to put in a good word for you?
November 5, 200916 yr Author Just bought a near-mint 600. So there. BTW: Thanks for the offers to lend out a pair; they're much appreciated.
November 5, 200916 yr Just bought a near-mint 600. So there. BTW: Thanks for the offers to lend out a pair; they're much appreciated. When are you gonna sell 'em? I give it 27 days. **BRENT**
November 5, 200916 yr This is the first and last time you attempt to tell someone on this website what they meant to say, asshat. hey, if someone wants to mock my post (that's totally fine with me), at least they can do so without logic fallacies and/or math errors.
November 5, 200916 yr Good choice! I put 600>650 also. They never kept me engaged, but in the price range there is nothing else that beats them IMO.
November 5, 200916 yr hey, if someone wants to mock my post (that's totally fine with me), at least they can do so without logic fallacies and/or math errors. How about I mock ban you?
November 5, 200916 yr hey, if someone wants to mock my post (that's totally fine with me), at least they can do so without logic fallacies and/or math errors. Except the logic fallacies are on your part, as evidenced with the above statement which actually contains a negative quantity of logic, i.e. it sucks logic from the surrounding posts. My math error was actually a statement about linear versus nonlinear effects and thinking. You are quite obviously a linear thinker caught in a very small box. Edited November 5, 200916 yr by morphsci
November 5, 200916 yr Author hey, if someone wants to mock my post (that's totally fine with me), at least they can do so without logic fallacies and/or math errors. As a member of the Head-Case legal team, we reserve all rights to mock whomever we wish in whatever form we wish, including, but not limited to, "logic [sic] fallacies" and math errors, if any.
November 5, 200916 yr Can we have a "last banned" stat instead of "newest member"? For some reason, I think it would be amusing.
November 8, 200916 yr Author I never had them silly. I bought them, packaged them up with other headphones, generated a certificate of authenticity, securitized them and sold the new securities to investors. The actual headphones will stay locked in a vault somewhere.
November 8, 200916 yr Someday we'll look back on this and laugh. (cf. classic orthodynamics and electrostatics and electrets and Grado HP-1000 series and...)
November 8, 200916 yr Yeah, I was thinking about buying a pair just for that purpose, but a) they're not yet discontinued they're dynamic c) they're not older than me.
November 11, 200916 yr Author They arrived today. Listening now. Nice phones. Not as bassy as the HD650, which is both good and bad. I think the lighter bass makes the soundstage less "blobby," but it also make the 600 a bit less fun at first blush. I think the 600 sounds a bit more like the HD800 than the 650 does. But certainly a nice sound and a lot more burn-in required until my opinions match exactly those of everyone else.
November 11, 200916 yr I kinda think the blobby-ness of the soundstage is because of the cups on that specific pair of 650s. These have especially blobby soundstage then the other pairs of 650s that I've heard
November 11, 200916 yr Author I agree that those wood cups make everything a bit 650er, but the 3 blobs effect is something I always noticed with the 650, even when I had a stock pair.
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now