Salt Peanuts Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 (edited) So that's a good excuse as any to get a backup body, right? D800? Edited April 23, 2013 by Salt Peanuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n_maher Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 With the d7000 I think. Once you get used to it it actually makes a lot of sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Took my 50mm out to play tonight. 1600 ISO, f1.4, 0.5 seconds, handheld. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikongod Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 I like that a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Thanks Ari. It was essentially pitch dark with just a single light bulb right above the bike. The image was a wee bit underexposed but I was able to fix that a little in LR but can't get the ghosts of the camera shake from around the seat out Any suggestions on how to fix that region? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikongod Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Thanks Ari. It was essentially pitch dark with just a single light bulb right above the bike. The image was a wee bit underexposed but I was able to fix that a little in LR but can't get the ghosts of the camera shake from around the seat out Any suggestions on how to fix that region? Clone them out in photoshop/GIMP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 ^ I really should learn how to use Photoshop and/or GIMP one of these days. I really like the shot, CJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffy Posted April 24, 2013 Report Share Posted April 24, 2013 Nice shot CJ. Steady hands considering you shot it at .5 sec handheld. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted April 25, 2013 Report Share Posted April 25, 2013 Thanks guys. Raffy, I had the camera stretched out with the strap against the back of my neck and I was leaning against a pillar. Standing free I would have never been able to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catscratch Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Some advice needed... What are some good options for vintage 50/55mm f1.2 primes that fit on a 5D Mk2? And by good I mean sensible, not crap optically, not absurdly rare/expensive, and not radioactive enough to grow a second head. Right now I'm looking at the Nikkor 50 1.2 AIS, it's available new, and it shouldn't suffer too much optical degradation or have issues focusing to infinity. I mostly want to do silly bokeh shots and want a lens that's sharp enough at the center wide-open but also has a good character to its bokeh. Canon's own 50L is far too expensive though for what is going to be mostly a one-trick lens, and not good enough to justify the price when stopped down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon L Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Some advice needed... What are some good options for vintage 50/55mm f1.2 primes that fit on a 5D Mk2? And by good I mean sensible, not crap optically, not absurdly rare/expensive, and not radioactive enough to grow a second head. Right now I'm looking at the Nikkor 50 1.2 AIS, it's available new, and it shouldn't suffer too much optical degradation or have issues focusing to infinity. I mostly want to do silly bokeh shots and want a lens that's sharp enough at the center wide-open but also has a good character to its bokeh. Canon's own 50L is far too expensive though for what is going to be mostly a one-trick lens, and not good enough to justify the price when stopped down.If you google EdMika or search for EdMika 55mm on eBay, you will get some good ideas. Ed makes classy brass eos adapters for certain FL/FD/nFD Canon lenses, of which the FL 55 mm f/1.2 lens is the most famous. Normally, one would have to track down a FL 55 mm f/1.2 lens, buy the EdMika adapter ($150), and do the conversion himself, but if you're lucky there would be one already converted for sale such as this one:http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-FD-FL-55-mm-F-1-2-Lens-with-EDMika-EF-/151034572756?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item232a5cafd4I had one before, but my friend really lusted after it, so I let him buy it since I already own the 50L anyway, and I tend to like AF on my 5D III, which does not have interchangeable focus screen like Mk II.This was a f1.2 test shot with the FL55.DZ3C2525 by drjlo1, on Flickr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catscratch Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Thanks Jon. I'll look into it. Isn't the FD 55 1.2 radioactive? And am I totally overestimating the risks of that? Lastly, would it be risky to take a lens like that through airport security? I do travel a lot when shooting. Great shot BTW. So far I'm managing MF with live view and a hood loupe, but it's a lengthy process for sure. Decent when you're composing a scene on a tripod for minutes, not good when you're trying to do an HDR panorama in fast moving light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agile_one Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Here's a couple of wide open shots from a Nikkor-S 55 1.2 (AI'd) with a D700. This is a relatively affordable old Nikon that gets mixed reviews, but the copy I had was good. As with any old optic, try before you buy is best. The lens ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikongod Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Thanks Jon. I'll look into it. Isn't the FD 55 1.2 radioactive? And am I totally overestimating the risks of that? Lastly, would it be risky to take a lens like that through airport security? I do travel a lot when shooting. Great shot BTW. Yes you are totally overestimating the risks of that. Yes it would be risky to take the lens through airport security. The X-ray machine could malfunction and fry your balls. Or the guy inspecting your bag could drop your lens. He may also say "I dont give a shit that you can ask (require) us to hand inspect your film, I'm gonna X-ray it" and fog your film. Yes, I have no idea if the FD 55F1.2 is radioactive, but I SERIOUSLY doubt it. This lens was made LONG after non-radioactive glass and clear-non-glass-solids (plastics and synthetic minerals) were developed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Radioactive is one of those words that make people panic as a knee-jerk reaction. The radiation in these lenses comes from Thorium which is primarily an alpha-emitter. Therefore, unless you are going to ingest the lens or grind it up and inhale it, you should be OK. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crappyjones123 Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 A few others from a couple of nights ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 He may also say "I dont give a shit that you can ask (require) us to hand inspect your film, I'm gonna X-ray it" and fog your film. Last week, the security at the Smithonian museums insisted putting my cameras through their X-ray machines. Understandable under the circumstance, but I'm wondeirng how the roll is going to look once I get it developed considering it went through 3 separate machines. Thankfully, I wasn't carrying extra film that day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catscratch Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 Yes, I have no idea if the FD 55F1.2 is radioactive, but I SERIOUSLY doubt it. This lens was made LONG after non-radioactive glass and clear-non-glass-solids (plastics and synthetic minerals) were developed. Well according to this is it, if that's the lens they're listing. I wasn't sure. My friend actually has a Yashica 50 that has a thorium rear element, and we measured it with a Geiger counter, but since that only measured beta and gamma radiation, we didn't pick much of anything up. Good to know they're not dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 (edited) More info on the sigma website: http://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/product/art/a_18_35_18/features.html That USB dock that lets you adjust focus position etc is fricking cool. The introductory pricing for the Sigma USB dock/software appears to be set at $60 (MSRP is $80). Bit surprised by that - I'd have expected it to be priced higher. I'm also mildly surprised by the fact they're supporting both Windows and OS X from the get go. Geek in me wants to get a supported Sigma lens just to check out the USB dock. EDIT - Am I the only one seeing eBay/NewEgg/etc. product links? Edited April 26, 2013 by Salt Peanuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Currawong Posted April 26, 2013 Report Share Posted April 26, 2013 A few others from a couple of nights ago. Seriously cool. Those are the kinds of shots I have been wanting to take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MexicanDragon Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 EDIT - Am I the only one seeing eBay/NewEgg/etc. product links? Nope. I saw them last night, and talked to Jeff about them in chat. I think it started yesterday. Maybe Todd is going Huddler-Case? **BRENT** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikongod Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 Someone gave me a 4x5" pinhole camera with a 50mm focal length. It is extremely wide. Englewood Public Library by Lord Nikon 12, on Flickr New Overpeck Park Bridge by Lord Nikon 12, on Flickr Click through for a couple more pics on my Flickr Stream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agile_one Posted April 27, 2013 Report Share Posted April 27, 2013 Am I remembering correctly that someone here was recently lusting after a Nikon 35mm f/2 D, or was it just fond recollection of having had one? In any case, I have a very recent copy on the way to me as part of a trade, and would much rather have a 50mm 1.4 for use with D600, because I use a Fuji X100 as my 35mm. I would be happy to let the 35 go to someone here for a good price. Just let me know, and I will get all the particulars as soon as I get my paws on the lens (Wed, 5/1). It is reputed to be recent, in perfect condition, and has box, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torpedo Posted April 29, 2013 Report Share Posted April 29, 2013 To those of you who take amazing photos and post them in the internets, this could be of interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt Peanuts Posted April 30, 2013 Report Share Posted April 30, 2013 I love the pic, Jacob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.