Yet Another Thread To Talk About Digital Cables.

discuss.

I get the lowest noisefloor out of bnc -> optical.

I get the lowest noisefloor out of bnc -> optical.

I get no noise when I cut my cable.....

The lowest noisefloor=, deathly quiet

nice bait..I will bite

Couple questions have been bugging me since I started thinking about digital cables.

On the most basic level, the signal inside the cable is modified by the reflection, and can be expressed as V1(z) = V0 (e^(-jbz) + Ghe* e^(jbz)); and the signal as it passed into the DAC can be expressed as V2=tau*V0*e^(-jbz), where tau = 1+ Ghe. Ghe = (Z2 (medium 2; digital interface) - Z1 (digital cable))/(Z2+Z1)

So if you have no reflection whatsoever going back into digital cable from the DAC, Ghe = 0, so V1 is the same as V2.

So if this is calculable, it must be measurable, the question is what does it sound like? If there is a difference which connector (BNC/XLR/RCA) can achieve the lowest Ghe value?

I would say the connection between a shovel and the back of your head.

That connection would need to be repeated many times to get a valid frame of reference.

But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth?

nice bait..I will bite

dude, stop posting

But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth?

I assume it would just be shit to signal ratio approaches infinity.

I assume it would just be shit to signal ratio approaches infinity.

nice bait..I will bite

Dude, seriously.

nice bait..I will bite

But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth?

∑_(H=1)^t▒H(α) p^2 ε_ns

Looks better in equation editor

Yeah, I have no idea what that urban-sidewalk-meets-brick-wall between "...^t..." and "...H(α)..." is meant to convey. Is that APL for "something mysterious happens here" or "fuzzy logic", perhaps?

It is supposed to be Summation (Sigma) H=1 to t of H(α)p

I liked my imagery better.

H(α)p

It looks better in the attachment

Equation.zip