nikongod Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 Yet Another Thread To Talk About Digital Cables. discuss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grahame Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherwood Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 I get the lowest noisefloor out of bnc -> optical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skullguise Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 I get the lowest noisefloor out of bnc -> optical. I get no noise when I cut my cable..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 The lowest noisefloor=, deathly quiet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC_Shadow Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 nice bait..I will bite Couple questions have been bugging me since I started thinking about digital cables. On the most basic level, the signal inside the cable is modified by the reflection, and can be expressed as V1(z) = V0 (e^(-jbz) + Ghe* e^(jbz)); and the signal as it passed into the DAC can be expressed as V2=tau*V0*e^(-jbz), where tau = 1+ Ghe. Ghe = (Z2 (medium 2; digital interface) - Z1 (digital cable))/(Z2+Z1) So if you have no reflection whatsoever going back into digital cable from the DAC, Ghe = 0, so V1 is the same as V2. So if this is calculable, it must be measurable, the question is what does it sound like? If there is a difference which connector (BNC/XLR/RCA) can achieve the lowest Ghe value? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voltron Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 I would say the connection between a shovel and the back of your head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swt61 Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 That connection would need to be repeated many times to get a valid frame of reference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitz Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvdunhill Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 nice bait..I will bite dude, stop posting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mypasswordis Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth? I assume it would just be shit to signal ratio approaches infinity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopstretch Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 I assume it would just be shit to signal ratio approaches infinity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aura Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 nice bait..I will bite Dude, seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamwhisper Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 nice bait..I will bite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beefy Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 But what's the formula for when the signal flows from ass to mouth? ∑_(H=1)^t▒H(α) p^2 ε_ns Looks better in equation editor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Yeah, I have no idea what that urban-sidewalk-meets-brick-wall between "...^t..." and "...H(α)..." is meant to convey. Is that APL for "something mysterious happens here" or "fuzzy logic", perhaps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 It is supposed to be Summation (Sigma) H=1 to t of H(α)p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Chalk Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 I liked my imagery better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiug31 Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 H(α)p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morphsci Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 It looks better in the attachmentEquation.zip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.